Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

MATHURABAI RAJARAM BHANDARI AND ANRversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS

Decided
Disposal
Dissmiss For Default/Non-Prosecution

Holding

The petition is dismissed for non‑prosecution.

Summary

The petitioners, Mathurabai Rajara Bhandari and an associate, filed a writ petition in the Bombay High Court seeking relief against the State of Maharashtra. The petition was listed for hearing, but the petitioners failed to appear when called. The court record shows that after 25 September 2017, the petitioners and/or their counsel did not take any steps to circulate or pursue the petition. The court inferred that the petitioners were not interested in continuing the proceedings. Consequently, the court dismissed the petition on the ground of non‑prosecution.

Issues considered

  • Whether a writ petition may be dismissed for non‑prosecution when the petitioners fail to appear and take steps to pursue the case.

Subjects

  • writ petition
  • dismissal
  • non-prosecution
  • high court
  • criminal appellate jurisdiction

Judgment

                             sbw                                                46-wp-2943-2017..doc

                                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

                                            CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

                                              WRIT PETITION NO.2943 OF 2017

                   Mathurabai Rajara Bhandari & Anr.                        … Petitioners

                               V/s.

                   State of Maharashtra & Ors.                              … Respondents



                   None for the Petitioners.
                   Mr. Vinod Chate, APP, for the Respondent-State.


                                                         CORAM :  A. S. GADKARI AND
                                                                  KAMAL KHATA, JJ.
                                                           DATE : 10th April, 2026.

                   P.C.:-

                   1)                 None for Petitioner, when called out for hearing.

                   2)                 Record indicates that, after 25th September, 2017, Petitioners

                   and/or their Advocate have not taken any steps to circulate the Petition,

                   even for once.

                   2.1)               It appears that, the Petitioners are not interested in pursuing

                   the Petition.

                   3)                 Dismissed for non-prosecution.



                                   (KAMAL KHATA, J.)                   (A.S. GADKARI, J.)



          Digitally signed
          by SANDHYA
SANDHYA BHAGU                                                                                          1/1
BHAGU   WADHWA
WADHWA Date:
        2026.04.20
          12:47:26 +0530


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.