Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

LAXMIKANT HEMRAJ BHARADIAversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR

Disposal
Disposed off as Withdrawn

Holding

The Court held that the petition may be withdrawn with liberty to file a fresh petition.

Summary

The petitioner, Laxmikant Hemraj Bharadia, filed a criminal writ petition before the Bombay High Court. After the charge-sheet was filed in the underlying criminal case, the petitioner sought leave to withdraw the writ petition and requested liberty to file a fresh petition. The petitioner’s counsel, Mr. Manoj Patil, argued that the filing of the charge-sheet rendered the writ petition unnecessary. The Court examined the request and, without providing extensive reasoning, granted the petitioner's prayer to withdraw the petition. Consequently, the Court ordered that the petition be withdrawn with liberty to file a fresh petition and disposed of the matter as withdrawn.

Issues considered

  • Whether a criminal writ petition may be withdrawn after the filing of a charge-sheet, and whether the court may grant liberty to file a fresh petition.

Subjects

  • criminal writ petition
  • withdrawal
  • charge-sheet
  • High Court
  • procedural law

Judgment

                                                                                        28-WP-296-2020 (CR).doc




                                     IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                                              CIRCUIT BENCH AT KOLHAPUR
                                            CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

                                          CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 296 OF 2020

                        Laxmikant Hemraj Bharadia                                  ]     Petitioner
                             Vs.
                        The State of Maharashtra and another                       ]     Respondents
                                                           …..
                        Mr. Manoj Patil, Advocate for Petitioner.

                        Mr. P.P. Deokar, A.P.P, for Respondent No.1 – State.
           Digitally
                                                            …..
           signed by
           SHAILAJA
SHAILAJA   SHRIKANT
SHRIKANT   HALKUDE
HALKUDE    Date:
           2026.06.24
                                                                  CORAM: SANDESH D. PATIL, J.
           13:00:49
           +0530
                                                                  DATED: 22nd JUNE 2026.
                        P. C. :
                        1.            Mr. Patil, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, states
                        that the charge-sheet has been filed and, therefore, seeks leave of this
                        Court to withdraw the petition with liberty to file a fresh petition.


                        2.         Leave as prayed for is granted. The petition is permitted to be
                        withdrawn with liberty as prayed for.


                        3.         The petition is disposed of as withdrawn.




                                                                               [SANDESH D. PATIL, J.]




                        Shailaja                              1


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.