Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

SUDHAKAR BHOJAYA SHETTYversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS

Decided
Disposal
Dissmiss For Default/Non-Prosecution

Holding

The petition is dismissed for non‑prosecution.

Summary

A writ petition was filed on 11 August 2016 by Sudhakar Bhojaya Shetty seeking relief against the State of Maharashtra and others. The petitioner failed to appear for the hearing and did not take any steps to circulate the petition after filing. The court observed that the petitioner appeared uninterested in pursuing the matter. Consequently, the petition was dismissed for non‑prosecution. The dismissal was recorded by the bench of Justices A.S. Gadkari and Kamal Khata on 24 March 2026.

Issues considered

  • Whether the writ petition should be dismissed on account of non‑prosecution by the petitioner

Subjects

  • writ petition
  • non-prosecution
  • dismissal
  • court procedure

Judgment

                             sns                                                   38-wp-2972-2016.doc

                                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

                                            CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

                                              WRIT PETITION NO.2972 OF 2016

                      Sudhakar Bhojaya Shetty                                 … Petitioner

                               V/s.

                      The State of Maharashtra & Ors.                         … Respondents




                      None for the Petitioner.
                      Smt. Madhavi H. Mhatre, APP, for the Respondent-State.


                                                          CORAM :      A. S. GADKARI AND
                                                                       KAMAL KHATA, JJ.
                                                            DATE :     24th March 2026

                      P.C.:-

                      1)              None for the Petitioner when called out for hearing.

                      2)              Record indicates that, since the date of filing of the Petition i.e.

                      11th August, 2016, the Petitioner and/or his Advocate has not taken any

                      steps to circulate the Petition, even for once.

                      2.1)            It appears that, the Petitioner is not interested in pursuing the

                      Petition.

                      3)              Dismissed for non-prosecution.



                                   (KAMAL KHATA, J.)                    (A.S. GADKARI, J.)


         Digitally
         signed by
                                                                                                         1/1
         SUMEDH
SUMEDH   NAMDEO
NAMDEO   SONAWANE
SONAWANE Date:
         2026.03.26
         15:19:35
         +0530


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.