Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

SHAIKH IRSHAD ABDUL RAZZAQUEversusRUBINA BEGAM MOHAMMAD GOUSS

Disposal
DISPOSED OFF

Holding

The petition stands disposed as there is nothing left for consideration after the disposal of the underlying civil suit.

Summary

Shaikh Irshad Abdul Razzaque filed writ petition No. 3048 of 2020 in the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad bench, against Rubina Begam Mohammad Gouss. The petitioner was represented by Advocate Siddharth B. Paikrao. While the petition was pending, the regular civil suit No. 47 of 2018, which formed the factual basis of the petition, was finally disposed of by the court. The bench observed that with the disposal of the civil suit, no issue or relief remained for the High Court to consider. Consequently, the writ petition was ordered to stand disposed.

Issues considered

  • Whether a writ petition remains maintainable when the underlying civil suit on which it is based has been disposed?

Subjects

  • writ petition
  • civil suit disposal
  • jurisdiction
  • petition dismissed
  • high court

Judgment

2026:BHC-AUG:485
                                                  1 of 1                  965-WP.3048.2020




                          IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                                     BENCH AT AURANGABAD

                                965 WRIT PETITION NO. 3048 OF 2020

                                 SHAIKH IRSHAD ABDUL RAZZAQUE
                                               VERSUS
                                RUBINA BEGAM MOHAMMAD GOUSS
                                                  ...
                Mr. Siddharth B. Paikrao, Advocate for the Petitioner.
                                                  ...

                                          CORAM :          SIDDHESHWAR S. THOMBRE, J.
                                          DATE        :    8th JANUARY, 2026

                P.C.:-

                1.        During the pendency of the present petition, Regular Civil

                Suit No.47 of 2018 has been disposed of. Therefore, nothing survives

                for consideration in this petition.


                2.        Hence, the petition stands disposed of.


                                                      (SIDDHESHWAR S. THOMBRE, J.)

      Tauseef


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.