Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

ATISH MOHAN BHALSINGHversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS.

Decided
Disposal
Dissmiss For Default/Non-Prosecution

Holding

The petition is dismissed for non-prosecution.

Summary

A writ petition was filed by Atish Mohan Bhalsingh before the High Court of Bombay. The petitioner failed to appear when called for hearing and did not take any steps to circulate the petition after 27th August 2014. The court noted the petitioner's lack of interest in pursuing the petition. Consequently, the court dismissed the petition on the ground of non-prosecution. The dismissal was ordered by the bench comprising Justices A.S. Gadkari and Shyam C. Chandak.

Issues considered

  • Whether a writ petition may be dismissed for non-prosecution when the petitioner fails to appear and does not pursue the petition.

Subjects

  • non-prosecution
  • petition dismissal
  • high court
  • criminal appellate jurisdiction
  • procedural default

Judgment

                    KSG                                                          10-WP-3072-2014.doc



                                    IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

                                          CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

                                            WRIT PETITION NO. 3072 OF 2014

                    Atish Mohan Bhalsingh                                       … Petitioner
                             V/s.
                    The State of Maharashtra & Ors                              … Respondents
                                        _______________________________________

                    None for the Petitioners.
                    Smt. M.H. Mhatre, A.P.P. for Respondent No.1-State.
                                    _______________________________________

                                                CORAM : A. S. GADKARI AND
                                                        SHYAM C. CHANDAK, JJ.
                                                DATE  : 17th JANUARY 2026

                    P.C. :

                    1)              None for Petitioner, when called out for hearing.

                    2)              Record indicates that, after 27th August 2014, Petitioner and/or

                    his Advocate has not taken any steps to circulate the Petition, even for once.
       Digitally
       signed by
       KIRAN
KIRAN SANJAY
SANJAY GHUGE
GHUGE Date:
       2026.01.19
                    2.1)            It appears that, the Petitioner is not interested in pursuing the
       19:01:15
       +0530



                    Petition.

                    3)              Dismissed for non-prosecution.




                             ( SHYAM C. CHANDAK, J. )                     ( A.S. GADKARI, J. )




                                                                                                       1/1


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.