Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

GANESH LAXMAN LAGASversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR.

Decided
Disposal
Dissmiss For Default/Non-Prosecution

Holding

The petition is dismissed for non‑prosecution.

Summary

The petitioner, Ganesh Laxman Lagas, filed a writ petition on 17 July 2018 in the High Court of Bombay. No appearance was made by the petitioner or his counsel when the matter was called for hearing. The court record shows that the petitioner did not take any steps to circulate the petition after filing. It was observed that the petitioner appeared uninterested in pursuing the relief sought. Consequently, the Court dismissed the petition on the ground of non‑prosecution. The dismissal was ordered by both judges on 18 April 2026.

Issues considered

  • Whether a writ petition may be entertained when the petitioner fails to appear or take steps to prosecute the petition

Subjects

  • writ petition
  • non‑prosecution
  • dismissal
  • criminal appellate jurisdiction
  • court procedure

Judgment

                         sbw                                                     343-wp-3081-2018.doc

                                    IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

                                          CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

                                            WRIT PETITION NO.3081 OF 2018

                    Ganesh Laxman Lagas                                     … Petitioner

                             V/s.

                    The State of Maharashtra & Anr.                         … Respondents




                    None for the Petitioner.
                    Smt. Mankuwar M. Deshmukh, Acting P. P., for the Respondent-State.


                                                        CORAM :      A. S. GADKARI AND
                                                                     KAMAL KHATA, JJ.
                                                          DATE :     18th April 2026

                    P.C.:-

                    1)              None for the Petitioner when called out for hearing.

                    2)              Record indicates that, since the date of filing of the Petition i.e.

                    17th July, 2018, the Petitioner and/or his Advocate has not taken any steps

                    to circulate the Petition, even for once.

                    2.1)            It appears that, the Petitioner is not interested in pursuing the

                    Petition.

                    3)              Dismissed for non-prosecution.



                                (KAMAL KHATA, J.)                     (A.S. GADKARI, J.)


       Digitally
       signed by
       SANDHYA
                                                                                                        1/1
SANDHYA BHAGU
BHAGU   WADHWA
WADHWA Date:
       2026.04.23
       12:02:08
       +0530


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.