Bombay High Court
MRS. USHADEVI MISTRILAL YADAVversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS
- Decided
- Disposal
- Disposed Off
Holding
The writ petitions were dismissed for non‑prosecution due to the petitioners’ failure to appear.
Summary
The petitioners, Jail Ahmed Shaikh and Mrs. Ushadevi Mistrilal Yadav, filed criminal writ petitions before the Bombay High Court seeking relief against the State of Maharashtra. No counsel appeared on behalf of the petitioners for either the initial hearing or the subsequent date. The State was represented by Mr. Ajay Patil, Assistant Public Prosecutor. Since the petitioners failed to appear and prosecute their petitions, the Court dismissed the writ petitions. No substantive legal issues were addressed, and the dismissal was entered as a matter of procedural default.
Subjects
- writ petition
- non‑prosecution
- dismissal
- procedural default
Judgment
28.WP.2165.2014.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.2165 OF 2014
WITH
CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.250 OF 2017
IN
CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.2165 OF 2014
Jail Ahmed Shaikh Petitioner
versus
The State of Maharashtra and others Respondents
WITH
CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.3123 OF 2015
Mrs.Ushadevi Mistrilal Yadav Petitioner
versus
The State of Maharashtra and others Respondents
None present for Petitioners.
Mr.Ajay Patil, APP, for State.
CORAM : A.S.GADKARI AND
PRAKASH D.NAIK, JJ.
DATE : 10th March 2023
PC :
Even on the second call none appears for the Petitioners.
Dismissed for non prosecution.
(PRAKASH D. NAIK, J.) (A.S.GADKARI, J.)
MST
Digitally signed by
MANISH MANISH SURESH
SURESH THATTE
Date: 2023.03.14
THATTE 17:10:20 +0530
Checking your session…