Bombay High Court
HINAA ARJMAND SHAIKHversusK.D.KOLHE AND ORS
- Decided
- Disposal
- Dissmiss For Default/Non-Prosecution
Holding
The petition was dismissed for non‑prosecution.
Summary
The petitioner filed a writ petition but failed to appear for the hearing. The record shows that after March 4, 2019, neither the petitioner nor her counsel took any steps to circulate the petition. The court observed that the petitioner was not interested in pursuing the petition. Consequently, the petition was dismissed for non‑prosecution. No substantive legal issues were addressed.
Issues considered
- Whether a writ petition can be dismissed for non‑prosecution when the petitioner does not appear or take steps to pursue it
Subjects
- non‑prosecution
- writ petition
- dismissal
- court procedure
Judgment
DTG 74-wp313.2019.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO. 313 OF 2019
Hinaa Arjmand Shaikh … Petitioner
V/s.
K.D.Kolhe & Ors. … Respondents
_______________________________________
None for Petitioner.
Smt. Madhavi H. Mhatre, A.P.P. for Respondent-State.
_______________________________________
CORAM : A. S. GADKARI AND
KAMAL KHATA, JJ.
DATE : 17th June 2026
P.C. :
1) None for the Petitioner when called out for hearing.
2) Record indicates that, after 4th March 2019, neither the
Petitioner nor her Advocate has taken any steps to circulate the Petition, even
once.
2.1) It appears that, the Petitioner is not interested in pursuing the
Petition.
3) Dismissed for non-prosecution.
( KAMAL KHATA, J. ) ( A.S. GADKARI, J. )
1/1
Checking your session…