Bombay High Court
JAGARAJU MAISAYYA YELAKARAJUversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS.
- Decided
- Disposal
- Dissmiss For Default/Non-Prosecution
Holding
The petition is dismissed for non‑prosecution.
Summary
The petitioner filed a writ petition in the Bombay High Court, but after February 7, 2019, neither the petitioner nor his counsel took any steps to advance the petition. The court observed that the petitioner appeared uninterested in pursuing the matter. Consequently, the judges noted the lack of prosecution of the petition. No substantive arguments or evidence were presented thereafter. Based on this inactivity, the court dismissed the petition for non‑prosecution.
Issues considered
- Whether the writ petition should be dismissed for non‑prosecution due to the petitioner's failure to take any further steps.
Subjects
- writ petition
- non‑prosecution
- dismissal
- court procedure
- high court
Judgment
pmk 68-WP-3212-2018.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO.3212 OF 2018
Jagaraju Maisayya Yalakaraju … Petitioner
V/s.
The State of Maharashtra & Ors. … Respondents
None for the Petitioner.
Ms. Madhavi H. Mhatre, APP for the Respondent-State.
CORAM : A. S. GADKARI AND
KAMAL KHATA, JJ.
DATE : 12th June, 2026
P.C.:-
1) None for Petitioners, when called out for hearing.
2) Record indicates that, after 7th February, 2019, neither
Petitioner nor his Advocate has taken any steps to circulate the Petition,
even once.
2.1) It appears that, the Petitioner is not interested in pursuing the
Petition.
3) Dismissed for non-prosecution.
(KAMAL KHATA, J.) (A.S. GADKARI, J.)
1/1
Checking your session…