Bombay High Court
FAROOQUE MINYA QURESHIversusHAMID SHAH IBRAHIM SHAH AND OTHERS
- Disposal
- DISPOSED OFF
Holding
The writ petitions are dismissed as infructuous.
Summary
The petitioners filed Writ Petition No. 320 of 2017 and Writ Petition No. 328 of 2017 before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, seeking relief. Counsel for the petitioners submitted that, owing to the passage of time, the matters had become infructuous. The Court considered the submissions and held that the delay rendered the petitions moot. Accordingly, the Court disposed of both writ petitions as infructuous. Any pending civil applications, if any, were also disposed of.
Issues considered
- Whether the writ petitions are infructuous due to lapse of time?
Subjects
- infructuous
- limitation
- writ petition
- civil application
- high court
Judgment
2026:BHC-AUG:10396
1 49 WP 320-2017.odt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
BENCH AT AURANGABAD
49 WRIT PETITION NO. 320 OF 2017
WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 14525 OF 2019 IN CP/320/2017
WITH
WRIT PETITION NO. 328 OF 2017
DEEPAK BABURAO WAKADE
VERSUS
MAHEBOOB KHAN KARIM KHAN AND OTHERS
…
Ms. Meenal S. Deshmukh h/f. Mr. D.R. Deshmukh – Advocate for
Petitioners
Mr. B.A. Shinde – AGP for Respondents, State
…
CORAM : SIDDHESHWAR S. THOMBRE, J.
DATE : 09.03.2026
PER COURT :
1. Writ Petition No. 328 of 2017 was not on board. Upon being
mentioned, the same is taken on board.
2. Learned Counsel for the petitioners in both the petitions submits
that, due to passage of time, the matters have become infructuous and,
therefore, nothing survives for consideration in the present petitions.
3. In view thereof, the Writ Petitions stand disposed of as infructuous.
4. Pending Civil Applications, if any, also stand disposed of.
[ SIDDHESHWAR S. THOMBRE ]
JUDGE
Pooja Kale/
Checking your session…