Bombay High Court

M/S. FIABRECOM INDUSTRIES LIMITED PROP. OF BILAL HUSAIN NAMRAHversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS

Decided: 18 April 2026
Disposal: Dissmiss For Default/Non-Prosecution
Bench: A S GADKARI KAMAL KHATA

Holding

The petition is dismissed for non‑prosecution.

Summary

M/s. Fiabrecom Industries Limited, represented by its proprietor Bilal Husain Namrah, filed a writ petition (No. 3291 of 2017) before the Bombay High Court challenging actions of the State of Maharashtra. The petition was filed on 14 August 2017, but the court observed that neither the petitioner nor its counsel took any steps to circulate the petition thereafter. The record indicated a lack of any activity or interest by the petitioner in pursuing the matter. The respondents, represented by Smt. P. P. Shinde, appeared before the court. The bench noted the petitioner's apparent disinterest and the failure to prosecute the petition. Consequently, the court dismissed the petition for non‑prosecution.

Issues considered

Whether the writ petition should be dismissed on account of non‑prosecution by the petitioner?

Subjects

writ petition
non-prosecution
dismissal
criminal appellate jurisdiction
Bombay High Court

Judgment

KSG 60-WP-3291-2017.doc

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

WRIT PETITION NO. 3291 OF 2017

M/s. Fiabrecom Industries
Limited Prop. of Bilal Husain Namrah … Petitioner
V/s.
State of Maharashtra & Ors … Respondents
_______________________________________

KIRAN
Digitally
signed by
KIRAN
SANJAY
None for the Petitioner.
SANJAY GHUGE

GHUGE Date:
2026.04.27
12:59:55
Smt. P. P. Shinde, A.P.P. for Respondent No.1-State.
+0530
Mr. Nitin Kamble, (Pairavi Officer) attached to Amboli Police Station,
Mumbai.
_______________________________________

CORAM : A. S. GADKARI AND
KAMAL KHATA, JJ.
DATE : 18th APRIL 2026

P.C. :

1) None for the Petitioner, when called out for hearing.

2) Record indicates that, since the date of filing of the Petition i.e.

14th August, 2017, the Petitioner and/or its Advocate has not taken any steps

to circulate the Petition, even for once.

2.1) It appears that, the Petitioner is not interested in pursuing the

Petition.

3) Dismissed for non-prosecution.

( KAMAL KHATA, J. ) ( A.S. GADKARI, J. )

1/1

Continue reading with your account

Checking your session…