Bombay High Court
VIMLADEVI SURESHCHANDRA VYASversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA
- Decided
- Disposal
- Dissmiss For Default/Non-Prosecution
Holding
The petition is dismissed for non‑prosecution.
Summary
The petitioner filed a writ petition on 10 August 2017. Since filing, the petitioner and her counsel failed to appear for any hearing and did not take any steps to circulate the petition. The court observed that the petitioner appeared uninterested in pursuing the petition. On this basis, the court considered whether the petition could be dismissed for non‑prosecution. The petition was dismissed for non‑prosecution.
Issues considered
- Whether a writ petition may be dismissed for non‑prosecution when the petitioner fails to appear or take steps to advance the petition
Subjects
- writ petition
- non‑prosecution
- court procedure
- dismissal
Judgment
pmk 61-WP-3292-2017.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO. 3292 OF 2017
Vimladevi Sureshchandra Vyas … Petitioner
V/s.
The State of Maharashtra … Respondent
None for the Petitioner.
Ms. Madhavi H. Mhatre, AGP for the Respondent-State.
CORAM : A. S. GADKARI AND
KAMAL KHATA, JJ.
DATE : 18th April, 2026
P.C.:-
1) None appears for Petitioner, when called out for hearing.
2) Record indicates that, since the date of filing of the Petition i.e.
10th August, 2017, the Petitioner and/or her Advocate has not taken any
steps to circulate the Petition, even for once.
2.1) It appears that, the Petitioner is not interested in pursuing the
Petition.
3) Dismissed for non-prosecution.
(KAMAL KHATA, J.) (A.S. GADKARI, J.)
1/1
Checking your session…