Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

LAXMAN MADHAVDAS HARWANIversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS

Decided
Disposal
Dissmiss For Default/Non-Prosecution

Holding

The petition is dismissed for non‑prosecution.

Summary

Petitioner Laxman Madhavdas Harwani filed a writ petition in the Bombay High Court. The petitioner failed to appear for the hearing and, according to the record, did not take any steps to circulate the petition after 3 December 2019. The court observed that the petitioner appeared uninterested in pursuing the petition. Consequently, the court dismissed the petition on the ground of non‑prosecution. The dismissal was ordered by both judges hearing the matter.

Issues considered

  • Whether the writ petition should be dismissed for non‑prosecution due to the petitioner's failure to appear and to advance the petition?

Subjects

  • writ petition
  • non‑prosecution
  • dismissal
  • criminal appellate jurisdiction
  • Bombay High Court

Judgment

                      KSG                                                          62-WP-3309-2017.doc



                                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

                                            CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

                                              WRIT PETITION NO. 3309 OF 2017

                      Laxman Madhavdas Harwani                                    … Petitioner
                               V/s.
                      State of Maharashtra & Ors                         … Respondents
                                      _______________________________________

                      None for the Petitioner.
         Digitally

KIRAN
         signed by
         KIRAN
         SANJAY
                      Mr. Vinod Chate, A.P.P. for Respondent No.1-State.
SANJAY   GHUGE

GHUGE    Date:
         2026.04.27
         12:59:53
         +0530
                                      _______________________________________

                                                  CORAM : A. S. GADKARI AND
                                                          KAMAL KHATA, JJ.
                                                  DATE  : 18th APRIL 2026

                      P.C. :

                      1)              None for the Petitioner, when called out for hearing.

                      2)              Record indicates that, after 3rd December 2019, Petitioner

                      and/or his Advocate has not taken any steps to circulate the Petition, even

                      for once.

                      2.1)            It appears that, the Petitioner is not interested in pursuing the

                      Petition.

                      3)              Dismissed for non-prosecution.




                                      ( KAMAL KHATA, J. )                   ( A.S. GADKARI, J. )




                                                                                                         1/1


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.