Bombay High Court
DABLUSINGH PUNJABSINGH TAKversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS
- Decided
- Disposal
- Disposed Off
- Bench
- ASHWIN D BHOBE
Holding
The petition is withdrawn with liberty to file a discharge application before the trial court.
Summary
The petitioner, Dablusingh Punjabsingh Tak, filed a criminal writ petition seeking the quash of FIR No. 319/2021 and the related charge-sheet and sessions case. He later instructed his counsel to withdraw the petition and instead file an application for discharge before the trial court. The respondent's counsel did not oppose the withdrawal. The Court, after hearing, granted leave to withdraw the petition and allowed the petitioner liberty to file a discharge application at the appropriate stage. The petition was consequently disposed of as withdrawn.
Issues considered
- Whether a criminal writ petition seeking quash of FIR and charge-sheet can be withdrawn by the petitioner
- Whether the petitioner may be granted liberty to file a discharge application before the trial court after withdrawal
Subjects
- withdrawal of petition
- criminal writ petition
- quash FIR
- discharge application
- procedural law
- criminal procedure
Judgment
13-WP-3310-2026.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 3310 OF 2026
Dablusingh Punjabsingh Tak … Petitioner
Versus
The State Of Maharashtra And Ors. … Respondents
__________________________________________________________
Mr. Vishal Janrao, Advocate for the Petitioner.
Mr. Sukanta Karmakar, APP for the Respondent – State.
__________________________________________________________
CORAM : ASHWIN D. BHOBE, J.
DATE : 10th July, 2026.
P.C. :
1. Heard Mr. Vishal Janrao, learned Advocate for the
Petitioner. He states that the substantive prayers in this present
Petition are prayer clause (a) and (b) which are transcribed herein
below in verbatim :-
“a) Issue appropriate writ, order or direction and thereby
quash and set aside FIR bearing C. R. No. 319/2021
registered with Hadapsar Police Station, Pune City qua the
present Petitioner namely Dablusingh Punjabsingh Tak, in the
interest of jutice.
b) Issue appropriate writ, order or direction and thereby
quash and set aside consequential charge-sheet and Sessions
Case No. 897/2022 pending before the learned District
Judge-25 and Additional Sessions Judge, Pune qua the
present Petitioner namely Dablusingh Punjabsingh Tak.”
Vivekanand 1
13-WP-3310-2026.doc
2. After having heard the matter for some time, Mr. Vishal
Janrao, learned Advocate for the Petitioner, on instructions from
the Petitioner, seeks leave to withdraw the present Petition with
liberty to file an Application seeking discharge before the Trial
Court at the appropriate stage. This request is not opposed by Mr.
Sukanta Karmakar, learned APP for the Respondent-State.
3. In view of the statement made by Mr. Vishal Janrao, learned
Advocate for the Petitioner, leave is granted to withdraw the
present Petition with liberty as prayed. If an Application seeking
discharge is filed before the Trial Court at the appropriate stage,
the same be considered on its own merits and in accordance with
law.
4. Criminal Writ Petition No. 3310 of 2026 is disposed of as
withdrawn.
(ASHWIN D. BHOBE, J.)
Vivekanand 2
Checking your session…