Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

BHANUBHAI PURSHOTTAMBHAI VARIAversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS.

Decided
Disposal
Dissmiss For Default/Non-Prosecution

Holding

The petition is dismissed for non-prosecution due to the petitioner's inaction.

Summary

The petitioner, Bhanubhai Purshottambhai Varia, filed a writ petition in the Bombay High Court. No representative appeared for the petitioner at the hearing. The court noted that since 9 February 2022, neither the petitioner nor his counsel had taken any steps to advance the petition. It was observed that the petitioner appeared uninterested in pursuing the relief sought. Consequently, the court dismissed the petition on the ground of non-prosecution.

Issues considered

  • Whether a writ petition may be dismissed for non-prosecution when the petitioner fails to appear or take steps to pursue the case

Subjects

  • writ petition
  • non-prosecution
  • court procedure
  • petition dismissed
  • high court

Judgment

                             sns                                                45-WP-3322-2019.doc




                                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

                                            CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

                                              WRIT PETITION NO.3322 OF 2019

                      Bhanubhai Purshottambhai Varia                              … Petitioner

                               V/s.

                      The State of Maharashtra & Ors.                             … Respondents



                      None for the Petitioner.
                      Mr. Ashish I. Satpute, APP for the Respondent-State.


                                                         CORAM :  A. S. GADKARI AND
                                                                  KAMAL KHATA, JJ.
                                                           DATE : 10th July, 2026

                      P.C.:-

                      1)              None for Petitioner when called out for hearing.

                      2)              Record indicates that, after 9th February, 2022, neither the

                      Petitioner nor her Advocate has taken any steps to circulate the Petition,

                      even once.

                      2.1)            It appears that, the Petitioner is not interested in pursuing the

                      Petition.

                      3)              Dismissed for non-prosecution.



                                   (KAMAL KHATA, J.)                   (A.S. GADKARI, J.)

         Digitally
         signed by
         SUMEDH
                                                                                                      1/1
SUMEDH   NAMDEO
NAMDEO   SONAWANE
SONAWANE Date:
         2026.07.15
         13:32:07
         +0530


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.