Bombay High Court
MR. MAHENDRA JAGGANATH TAREversusHON. VICE PRESIDENT OF MHADA AND ORS
- Decided
- Disposal
- Disposed Off
- Bench
- M S KARNIKS M MODAK
Holding
The Court allowed the interim application and permitted the petitioner to withdraw the writ petition with liberty to re‑file, disposing of both the interim application and the writ petition.
Summary
Mahendra Jagganath Tare filed a writ petition (No. 3324 of 2024) against the Vice President of MHADA and other respondents seeking relief. An interim application was filed seeking a specific relief under prayer clause (a). The High Court examined whether the interim relief should be granted and whether the petitioner could be allowed to withdraw the writ petition and re‑file with better particulars. The Court found no impediment to granting the interim relief and permitted the withdrawal of the writ petition with liberty to re‑file. Consequently, the interim application was allowed and the writ petition was withdrawn, leading to the disposal of both matters.
Issues considered
- Whether the interim application seeking relief under prayer clause (a) should be allowed
- Whether the petitioner may be permitted to withdraw the writ petition and re‑file with better particulars
Subjects
- interim relief
- writ petition
- withdrawal
- procedural law
- MHADA
- BMC
Judgment
901-ia 5202-26.doc
ARJUN
MACHHINDRA IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
KADAM
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
Digitally signed by
ARJUN MACHHINDRA
KADAM INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 5202 OF 2026
Date: 2026.08.06
18:36:37 +0530 IN
WRIT PETITION NO. 3324 OF 2024
Mr. Mahendra Jagganath Tare … Applicant
Versus
Hon. Vice President of MHADA & Ors. ... Respondents
__________________________
Mr. Archit G. Manurkar a/w. Ms. Pooja Mhatre for the Applicant.
Mr. P. G. Lad for the Respondent-MHADA.
Mr. D. R. Kawale for the Respondent-BMC.
Mr. Viraj Jadhav for Respondent No.7.
__________________________
CORAM : M. S. KARNIK AND
S. M. MODAK, JJ.
DATED : 6th AUGUST, 2026.
P.C. :
1. For the reasons mentioned in the application, the Interim Application
is allowed in terms of prayer clause (a). Consequently, the Writ Petition is
allowed to be withdrawn with liberty to file afresh with better particulars.
2. Interim Application as well as the Writ Petition are disposed of.
(S. M. MODAK, J.) (M. S. KARNIK, J.)
Amk 1/1
Checking your session…