Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

KASHINATH BABU SHINDEversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS.

Decided
Disposal
Dissmiss For Default/Non-Prosecution

Holding

The petition is dismissed for non‑prosecution.

Summary

The petitioner filed a writ petition on 21 June 2019 but failed to appear for the hearing and made no effort to advance the petition thereafter. The court observed that the petitioner appeared uninterested in pursuing the matter. Consequently, the petition was dismissed for non‑prosecution. No substantive factual or legal issues were addressed beyond the lack of prosecution. The dismissal was entered by the two judges of the Bombay High Court.

Issues considered

  • Whether a writ petition may be dismissed for non‑prosecution when the petitioner does not appear or take steps to pursue it

Subjects

  • writ petition
  • non‑prosecution
  • dismissal
  • high court

Judgment

                ssm                                                        47-wp3328.2019.doc

                             IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

                                   CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

                                     WRIT PETITION NO. 3328 OF 2019

           Kashinath Babu Shinde                                     …..Petitioner

                    Vs.

           State Of Maharashtra & Ors.                               …..Respondents

                                  ____________________________________

           None for the Petitioner.
           Mr. J.P. Yagnik APP, for the Respondent-State.
                             ____________________________________

                                                 CORAM :      A. S. GADKARI AND
                                                              KAMAL KHATA, JJ.
                                                   DATE :     22nd JUNE, 2026.


           P.C.:-

           1)                None for the Petitioner when called out for hearing.

           2)                Record indicates that, since the date of filing of the Petition i.e.

           21st June, 2019, neither the Petitioner nor his Advocate has taken any steps

           to circulate the Petition, even once.

           2.1)              It appears that, the Petitioner is not interested in pursuing the

           Petition.

           3)                Dismissed for non-prosecution.



                      (KAMAL KHATA, J.)                             (A.S. GADKARI, J.)

          Digitally signed
          by SANJIV
          SHARNAPPA
SANJIV    MASHALKAR
SHARNAPPA                                                                                       1/1
MASHALKAR Date:
          2026.06.29
          12:23:21
          +0530


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.