Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

BAPU PRABHAKAR NAIR @ KUMARversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS

Decided
Disposal
Dissmiss For Default/Non-Prosecution

Holding

The petition is dismissed for non‑prosecution.

Summary

The petitioner, Bapu Prabhakar Nair, filed a writ petition on 18 August 2017 in the Bombay High Court. He failed to appear for the hearing and did not take any steps to circulate the petition. The court observed that the petitioner appeared uninterested in pursuing the case. Consequently, the court dismissed the petition on the ground of non‑prosecution. The dismissal was ordered by both judges.

Issues considered

  • Whether the writ petition should be dismissed for non‑prosecution due to petitioner’s inaction?

Subjects

  • writ petition
  • non-prosecution
  • dismissal
  • criminal appellate jurisdiction
  • Bombay High Court

Judgment

                      KSG                                                         64-WP-3334-2017.doc



                                   IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

                                          CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

                                            WRIT PETITION NO. 3334 OF 2017

                      Bapu Prabhakar Nair @ Kumar                               … Petitioner
                           V/s.
                      State of Maharashtra & Ors                         … Respondents
                                      _______________________________________

                      None for the Petitioner.
         Digitally
         signed by    Smt. P. P. Shinde, A.P.P. for Respondent No.1-State.
KIRAN    KIRAN
         SANJAY
SANJAY   GHUGE
                      Mr. M. V. Jagtap, P.S.I., attached to Bibvewadi Police Station, Pune is present.
         Date:
GHUGE    2026.04.27
         12:59:52
         +0530
                                        _______________________________________

                                                CORAM : A. S. GADKARI AND
                                                        KAMAL KHATA, JJ.
                                                DATE  : 18th APRIL 2026

                      P.C. :

                      1)           None for the Petitioner, when called out for hearing.

                      2)           Record indicates that, since the date of filing of the Petition i.e.

                      18th August, 2017, the Petitioner and/or his Advocate has not taken any steps

                      to circulate the Petition, even for once.

                      2.1)         It appears that, the Petitioner is not interested in pursuing the

                      Petition.

                      3)           Dismissed for non-prosecution.




                                   ( KAMAL KHATA, J. )                     ( A.S. GADKARI, J. )




                                                                                                        1/1


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.