Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

ANUBHAV BHATTER AND ANRversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR

Decided
Disposal
Allowed

Holding

Compliance with the Court's payment direction resulted in the disposal of the writ petitions.

Summary

The petitioners, Anubhav Bhatter & Anr. and Asit Kumar Ghosh, filed separate criminal writ petitions before the Bombay High Court challenging orders of the State of Maharashtra. The Court directed the petitioners to deposit a specified payment as a condition for further consideration. The petitioners complied with the direction and deposited the required amount. Upon receipt of the payment, the petitioners moved the Court seeking disposal of the writ petitions. The Court, after hearing counsel, noted that the condition had been satisfied. Consequently, the Court ordered that both writ petitions be disposed of. No further orders or directions were made.

Issues considered

  • What was the effect of the petitioners' compliance with the Court's direction to deposit payment on the pending writ petitions?

Subjects

  • criminal writ petition
  • payment compliance
  • disposal
  • High Court

Judgment

                                                                                    21-WP-3364-2023 (CR).doc


                             S.S.Kilaje


                                          IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                                                CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

                                             CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 3364 OF 2023

                             Anubhav Bhatter And Anr.                                   … Petitioners
                             VERSUS
                             State Of Maharashtra And Anr.                              … Respondents
          Digitally signed


                                                             WITH
          by SONALI
SONALI SATISH
       KILAJE
SATISH Date:
KILAJE 2026.05.05
       11:33:45
          +0700

                                             CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 4212 OF 2023

                             Asit Kumar Ghosh                                           … Petitioners
                             VERSUS
                             The State Of Maharashtra And Ors.                          … Respondents

                             _________________________________________________________________

                             Mr. Wesley Menezes, Advocate for Petitioners.
                             Mr. S.R.Agarkar, APP for the Respondent-State.
                             Mr. Pervez M. Rustomkhan, Advocate for Respondent No.2.
                             _________________________________________________________________

                                                                   CORAM        :   SHIVKUMAR DIGE, J.
                                                                   DATE         :   30th APRIL, 2026.
                             P.C. :

                             1.           Heard learned counsel for the petitioners, learned APP for the

                             State and learned counsel for respondents.

                             2.           Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners

                             have deposited the payment as directed by Court.

                             3.           In view thereof, both the Writ Petitions are disposed of.



                                                                              (SHIVKUMAR DIGE, J.)



                                                                Page 1 of 1


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.