Bombay High Court
NITESH SADARANGANIversusUNION OF INDIA AND ORS
- Decided
- Disposal
- Disposed off as Withdrawn
- Bench
- AMIT BORKAR
Holding
The writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
Summary
The petitioner filed a writ petition in the Bombay High Court and subsequently filed a praecipe seeking its withdrawal. The Court accepted the withdrawal and dismissed the writ petition as withdrawn. The Court, however, directed that the substantive contentions raised in the petition may be pursued before the trial court. No merits of the petition were adjudicated. The order was pronounced by Justice Amit Borkar on 27 March 2026.
Subjects
- writ petition
- withdrawal
- dismissal
- high court
Judgment
902-cwp-343-13.doc
MPBalekar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO. 343 OF 2013
Nitesh Sadarangani … Petitioner
V/s.
Union of India and Ors. … Respondents
Mr. Sachwani Anand Mohanlal for the petitioner.
Mrs. Megha S. Bajoria, APP, for the State.
Mr. S.S. Chandrashekhar a/w Abhishek Mishra for the
respondents.
CORAM : AMIT BORKAR, J.
DATED : MARCH 27, 2026
P.C.:
1. The learned counsel for the petitioner has filed a praecipe for
withdrawal of the writ petition.
2. The writ petition, therefore, stands dismissed as withdrawn.
However, contentions raised in the writ petition are kept open to
be agitated before the Trial Court.
(AMIT BORKAR, J.)
1
Checking your session…