Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

NITESH SADARANGANIversusUNION OF INDIA AND ORS

Decided
Disposal
Disposed off as Withdrawn

Holding

The writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn.

Summary

The petitioner filed a writ petition in the Bombay High Court and subsequently filed a praecipe seeking its withdrawal. The Court accepted the withdrawal and dismissed the writ petition as withdrawn. The Court, however, directed that the substantive contentions raised in the petition may be pursued before the trial court. No merits of the petition were adjudicated. The order was pronounced by Justice Amit Borkar on 27 March 2026.

Subjects

  • writ petition
  • withdrawal
  • dismissal
  • high court

Judgment

                                                             902-cwp-343-13.doc

MPBalekar

             IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                   CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

                      WRIT PETITION NO. 343 OF 2013

Nitesh Sadarangani                                … Petitioner
           V/s.
Union of India and Ors.                           … Respondents

Mr. Sachwani Anand Mohanlal for the petitioner.
Mrs. Megha S. Bajoria, APP, for the State.
Mr. S.S. Chandrashekhar a/w Abhishek Mishra for the
respondents.

                                 CORAM      : AMIT BORKAR, J.

                                 DATED      : MARCH 27, 2026

P.C.:

1.          The learned counsel for the petitioner has filed a praecipe for
withdrawal of the writ petition.

2.          The writ petition, therefore, stands dismissed as withdrawn.
However, contentions raised in the writ petition are kept open to
be agitated before the Trial Court.


                                                   (AMIT BORKAR, J.)




                                       1


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.