Bombay High Court
NAGINA HASANversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS
- Decided
- Disposal
- Dissmiss For Default/Non-Prosecution
Holding
The petition is dismissed for non‑prosecution.
Summary
Nagina Hasan filed Writ Petition No. 3438 of 2013 in the Bombay High Court challenging actions of the State of Maharashtra and others. The petitioner failed to appear for the hearing and, according to the record, did not take any steps to circulate the petition after 8 October 2018. The court observed that the petitioner appeared uninterested in pursuing the matter. Consequently, the court dismissed the petition on the ground of non‑prosecution. The dismissal was ordered by a two‑judge bench of Justice A.S. Gadkari and Justice Kamal Khata.
Issues considered
- What is the appropriate course of action when a petitioner fails to appear and does not pursue a writ petition?
Subjects
- writ petition
- non‑prosecution
- dismissal
- High Court
- criminal appellate jurisdiction
Judgment
pmk 13-WP-3438-2013.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO.3438 OF 2013
Nagina Hasan … Petitioner
V/s.
The State of Maharashtra & Ors. … Respondents
None for the Petitioner.
None for the Respondent No.2.
Smt. Madhavi H. Mhatre, APP for the Respondent-State.
CORAM : A. S. GADKARI AND
KAMAL KHATA, JJ.
DATE : 18th April, 2026
P.C.:-
1) None for Petitioner, when called out for hearing.
2) Record indicates that, after 8th October, 2018 Petitioner and/or
her Advocate has not taken any steps to circulate the Petition, even for
once.
2.1) It appears that, the Petitioner is not interested in pursuing the
Petition.
3) Dismissed for non-prosecution.
(KAMAL KHATA, J.) (A.S. GADKARI, J.)
1/1
Checking your session…