Bombay High Court
RAVINDRA PANDURANG NALAWADEversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA
- Decided
- Disposal
- Dissmiss For Default/Non-Prosecution
Holding
The petition is dismissed for non‑prosecution.
Summary
The petitioner filed a writ petition on 24 August 2017 but failed to appear for the hearing and did not take any steps to circulate the petition thereafter. The court observed that the petitioner appeared uninterested in pursuing the matter. Consequently, the petition was dismissed for non‑prosecution.
Issues considered
- Whether the writ petition should be dismissed for non‑prosecution due to the petitioner's failure to appear and pursue the case
Subjects
- writ petition
- non‑prosecution
- dismissal
Judgment
KSG 76-WP-3451-2017.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO. 3451 OF 2017
Ravindra Pandurang Nalawade … Petitioner
V/s.
State of Maharashtra … Respondent
_______________________________________
None for the Petitioner.
Digitally
signed by Smt. P. P. Shinde, A.P.P. for Respondent No.1-State.
KIRAN KIRAN
SANJAY
SANJAY GHUGE
_______________________________________
Date:
GHUGE 2026.04.27
12:59:53
+0530
CORAM : A. S. GADKARI AND
KAMAL KHATA, JJ.
DATE : 18th APRIL 2026
P.C. :
1) None for the Petitioner, when called out for hearing.
2) Record indicates that, since the date of filing of the Petition i.e.
24th August, 2017, the Petitioner and/or his Advocate has not taken any steps
to circulate the Petition, even for once.
2.1) It appears that, the Petitioner is not interested in pursuing the
Petition.
3) Dismissed for non-prosecution.
( KAMAL KHATA, J. ) ( A.S. GADKARI, J. )
1/1
Checking your session…