Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

SHRIKANT HARISHCHANDRA HODAWADEKARversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS

Decided
Disposal
Dismissed as Withdrawn

Holding

The petition is dismissed, granting the petitioner liberty to withdraw and pursue the statutory remedy under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023.

Summary

The petitioner, Shrikant Harishchandra Hodawadekar, filed Criminal Writ Petition No. 3470 of 2025 in the Bombay High Court seeking permission to withdraw the petition and to avail a statutory remedy under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. The petitioner’s counsel, B. K. Barve & Co., argued for withdrawal, while the State of Maharashtra was represented by the Additional Public Prosecutor. The Court considered whether the petitioner could be allowed to withdraw the writ and pursue the alternative remedy. The Court held that the petition could be withdrawn and granted the petitioner liberty to seek the statutory remedy. Accordingly, the writ petition was dismissed with the liberty granted to the petitioner.

Issues considered

  • Whether the petitioner may withdraw the criminal writ petition and avail of a statutory remedy under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • writ petition
  • withdrawal
  • statutory remedy
  • Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita
  • criminal appellate jurisdiction

Judgment

                                                                     909.3470.25-wp.docx




                               IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                                     CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

                                  CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.3470 OF 2025

         Digitally
         signed by
                      Shrikant Harishchandra Hodawadekar              .. Petitioner
         BASAVRAJ
BASAVRAJ GURAPPA
GURAPPA PATIL
                            Vs.
PATIL    Date:
         2026.01.09
                      State of Maharashtra & Ors.                     .. Respondents
         11:08:42
         +0530                                         ...
                      Mr. Sandeep Barve, Mr. Simmy Sebastian,
                      Ms. Anushka Barve and Ms. Diksha Gaikwad i/b.
                      B. K. Barve & Co., Advocates for the Petitioner
                      Mr. K. V. Saste, Additional Public Prosecutor for the
                      Respondent No.1-State

                                         CORAM : SHREE CHANDRASHEKHAR, CJ &
                                                 GAUTAM A. ANKHAD, J.

                                         DATE      : 8th JANUARY 2026

                      P.C. :
                            After arguing for some time, Mr. Sandeep Barve, the learned
                      counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the writ
                      petition with liberty to avail of statutory remedy as available to the
                      petitioner under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023.
                      2.       Writ Petition No.3470 of 2025 is dismissed with the aforesaid
                      liberty granted in favour of the petitioner.

                      [GAUTAM A. ANKHAD, J.]                                [CHIEF JUSTICE]




                      bgp                                                                  Page | 1


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.