Bombay High Court
SHRI. RAJARAM GANGARAM PARDESHIversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS
- Decided
- Disposal
- Disposed Off
- Bench
- AMIT BORKAR
Holding
The petition is infructuous because the no‑confidence motion proceedings are concluded, leaving no matter for adjudication.
Summary
The petitioners filed a writ petition arising out of the proceedings of a no‑confidence motion that took place in 2014. The petition sought relief from the High Court of Bombay. The Court examined whether any issue remained for adjudication given that the no‑confidence motion had already been concluded. It held that the underlying proceedings were complete and therefore there was nothing left to be decided. Consequently, the writ petition was declared infructuous and disposed of without any costs.
Issues considered
- Whether the writ petition is maintainable when the underlying no‑confidence motion proceedings have been concluded
- Whether any relief can be granted in a petition that is rendered moot by the finality of the original proceedings
Subjects
- writ petition
- infructuous
- no confidence motion
- civil appellate jurisdiction
- Bombay High Court
Judgment
78-WP-3492-14.doc
Sayali
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
SAYALI WRIT PETITION NO. 3492 OF 2014
DEEPAK
UPASANI
Digitally signed by
Rajaram Gangaram Pardeshi … Petitioners
SAYALI DEEPAK V/s.
UPASANI
Date: 2026.03.04
16:54:22 +0530 The State of Maharashtra and Others … Respondents
Mr. Sachin Gite, for Petitioner.
Mr. A. C. Bhadang, AGP for State-Respondent Nos. 1
to 4.
CORAM : AMIT BORKAR, J.
DATED : MARCH 04, 2026
P.C.:
1. The petition arises out of proceedings of no confidence
motion of the year 2014. Hence, nothing remains to be
adjudicated in the present writ petition.
2. The writ petition stands disposed of as infructuous. No
costs.
(AMIT BORKAR, J.)
1
Checking your session…