Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

SUMEET ASHOK SAMATversusERA@VARUNI SUMEET SAMAT

Decided
Disposal
Allowed To be withdrawn

Holding

The writ petition was allowed to be withdrawn and disposed of.

Summary

The petitioner, Sonali, filed a writ petition in the Bombay High Court challenging matters arising from consent terms entered into before the Family Court, Jaipur. The petitioner, through counsel Ayush Pasbola, sought to withdraw the writ petition, stating that the parties had reached an agreement. The respondent, represented by Savita M. Yadav, did not oppose the withdrawal. The Court considered whether a writ petition could be withdrawn after the parties had entered into consent terms. It held that the petitioner was free to withdraw the petition and granted liberty to file any necessary application thereafter. Consequently, the writ petition was allowed to be withdrawn and disposed of.

Issues considered

  • Whether a writ petition filed in the High Court can be withdrawn after parties have entered into consent terms before a Family Court

Subjects

  • writ petition
  • withdrawal
  • family court
  • consent terms
  • civil procedure

Judgment

                                                                       905-WP-3502-2024.DOC




                              IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                                    CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
                                      WRIT PETITION NO.3502 OF 2024

       Digitally
       signed by    Sumeet Ashok Samat                                    …Petitioner
       SONALI
SONALI MILIND            Versus
MILIND PATIL
PATIL Date:         Era @ Varuni Sumeet Samat & Anr.                      …Respondents
       2026.07.07
       16:30:36
       +0530



                    Mr. Ayush Pasbola, for the Petitioner.
                    Mrs. Savita M. Yadav, APP, for the Respondent-State.


                                          CORAM:      MADHAV J. JAMDAR, J.
                                          DATED :     7th JULY 2026
                    P. C.:


                    1.       Mr. Ayush Pasbola, learned Counsel appearing for the

                    Petitioner, submits that the Petitioner and Respondent No. 1 have

                    entered into Consent Terms before the learned Family Court,

                    Jaipur. He submits that he has instructions to withdraw the Writ

                    Petition. However, he submits that liberty be granted to file an

                    appropriate Application, if necessary.



                    2.       Accordingly, the Writ Petition is allowed to be withdrawn

                    and disposed of with liberty as aforesaid.



                                                                 [MADHAV J. JAMDAR, J.]




                                                    Page 1
                    Sonali


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.