Bombay High Court
MR. NARAHARI BHIMRAO HANDUR KULKARNIversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS.
- Decided
- Disposal
- Disposed Off
- Bench
- AMIT BORKAR
Holding
A writ petition is dismissed in default when the petitioner fails to appear for the scheduled hearing.
Summary
The petitioner, Mr. Narhari Bhimrao Handur Kulkarni, filed Writ Petition No. 3511 of 2017 in the Bombay High Court challenging actions of the State of Maharashtra and others. No counsel or representative appeared on the petitioner’s behalf on the scheduled hearing dates, including the most recent hearing on 5 March 2024. The Court noted the petitioner’s consistent non‑appearance despite previous notices. In accordance with procedural rules, the Court directed that the petition be listed for dismissal due to default. Consequently, the writ petition was dismissed in default for failure to appear.
Issues considered
- What is the appropriate consequence when a petitioner fails to appear for hearing in a writ petition?
Subjects
- writ petition
- default dismissal
- civil procedure
- non‑appearance
- Bombay High Court
Judgment
16.3511.17 wp.docx
Iresh
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO. 3511 OF 2017
Mr. Narhari Bhimrao Handur Kulkarni .....Petitioner
Vs.
The State of Maharashtra and Ors .....Respondents
None for the petitioner
Smt. Sulbha Chipde AGP for the State
CORAM : GAURI GODSE, J.
DATE : 5th MARCH 2024
P.C.
1. None appears for the petitioner. Even on last occasion, none had
appeared for the petitioner. Hence, the petition was directed to be
listed today for dismissal.
2. Even today, none appears for the petitioner. Writ petition is
dismissed in default.
[GAURI GODSE, J.]
1/1
Signed by: Iresh S. Mashal
Designation: PS To Honourable Judge
Date: 06/03/2024 12:37:56
Checking your session…