Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

PARSHURAM LAXMAN RAVALELLUversusBABAN DADU KALE

Decided
Disposal
Disposed Off

Holding

The petition is dismissed as both parties failed to appear despite a prior warning of dismissal.

Summary

The petitioner, Parshuram Laxman Ravelalu, filed a writ petition before the High Court of Bombay. The Court scheduled a hearing for 13 January 2026 and warned that the petition would be dismissed if the petitioner failed to appear. On the scheduled date, neither the petitioner nor the respondent, Baban Dadu Kale, appeared before the Court. The Court noted its earlier order that non‑appearance would lead to dismissal. Accordingly, the Court dismissed the writ petition. The dismissal was based solely on procedural default, with no substantive merits considered.

Issues considered

  • Whether the writ petition should be dismissed for non‑appearance of the petitioner and respondent despite prior warning

Subjects

  • writ petition
  • non‑appearance
  • procedural dismissal
  • high court

Judgment

                                                                                           3-WP-3533-2005.doc


                                          IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

           Digitally signed
                                                       CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
           by KANCHAN
KANCHAN PRASHANT
PRASHANT DHURI                                     WRIT PETITION NO. 3533 OF 2005
DHURI    Date:
         2026.01.14
           11:06:02 +0530
                              Parshuram Laxman Ravalellu                              … Petitioner
                                       Versus
                              Baban Dadu Kale                                         … Respondent
                                                                   ………...
                              None for the Petitioner.
                              None for the Respondent.
                                                                   ………...

                                                                   CORAM       :      ABHAY AHUJA, J.
                                                                   DATE        :      13 JANUARY 2026

                              P.C. :


                              1.          None for the Petitioner. None for the Respondent.

                              2.          On 25th November 2025, the following order was passed :

                                                       “1.   None appears for the Petitioner.
                                                       2.    List on 13th January 2026.
                                          3. It is made clear that if none appears for the
                                          Petitioner, this Court will consider dismissing the
                                          Petition.”


                              4.          It was recorded in paragraph 3 of the said order that if none

                              appears for the Petitioner, this Court will consider dismissing the

                              Petition.




                              Kanchan Dhuri                                                                1/2
                                                         3-WP-3533-2005.doc


5.         Again today none appears for the Petitioner nor for the

Respondent.

6.         Accordingly, the Writ Petition stands dismissed.




                                                    (ABHAY AHUJA, J.)




Kanchan Dhuri                                                            2/2


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.