Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

DIPESHRI RAJARAM CHAVANversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS.

Disposal
Disposed Off

Holding

The petition was declared infructuous and disposed of because the accused had already been convicted.

Summary

The petitioner, Dipeshri Rajaram Chavan, filed a criminal writ petition challenging the proceedings against the accused. The learned Additional Public Prosecutor submitted that the accused had already been convicted by the Additional Sessions Court in Sessions Case No. 04 of 2018 on 30 October 2025. The court held that, in view of the prior conviction, the petition could no longer be entertained. Consequently, the petition was declared infructuous and disposed of. No further relief was granted to the petitioner.

Issues considered

  • Whether a writ petition challenging criminal proceedings remains maintainable after the accused has been convicted in the trial court?

Subjects

  • criminal procedure
  • writ petition
  • infructuous
  • conviction
  • disposal

Judgment

                                                                                        14-WP-3542-2018 (CR).docx


                                            IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                                                     CIRCUIT BENCH AT KOLHAPUR

                                                     CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

                                                    CR. WRIT PETITION NO. 3542 OF 2018

                              Dipeshri Rajaram Chavan                                … Petitioner
                                                     Versus
                              The State Of Maharashtra And Ors.                      … Respondent



                                                             ——————
                              Mr. Omneel A. Jadhav (Through V.C.) for the Petitioner.
                              Mr. Shriram S. Chaudhari, A.G.P. for the Respondent-State.
                              Officer : PSI Mr. Namdev D. Shinde, Mandangad Police Station, present.
                                                             ——————

                                                     Coram :      MRS. VRUSHALI V. JOSHI &
                                                                  RANJITSINHA RAJA BHONSALE, JJ.

                                                     Date     :   18th March 2026.

                              P. C. :

                              1.        Learned A.P.P., on instructions, submits that as the accused in present

                              case have already been convicted by the Additional Sessions Court in Sessions

                              Case No. 04 of 2018 vide order dated 30 th October 2025, the present Petition

                              has become infructuous.

                              2.        Petition therefore stands disposed of as become infructuous.



                              [ RANJITSINHA RAJA BHONSALE, J. ]              [ MRS. VRUSHALI V. JOSHI, J. ]

           Digitally signed
           by OMKAR           osk                                   1 of 1
           SHIVAHAR
OMKAR      KUMBHAKARN
SHIVAHAR
KUMBHAKARN Date:
           2026.03.25
           15:26:51
           +0530


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.