Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

JAGMOHAN RAMDITTAMAL VOHRA AND ANR.versusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Decided
Disposal
Dissmiss For Default/Non-Prosecution

Holding

The petition is dismissed for non‑prosecution.

Summary

The petitioners, Jagmohan Ramdittamal Vhora & Anr., filed a writ petition (No. 3551 of 2018) in the Bombay High Court seeking relief against the State of Maharashtra. The petitioners failed to appear when called for hearing and, after 14 August 2018, neither they nor their counsel took any steps to circulate the petition. The court inferred that the petitioners were not interested in pursuing the matter. Consequently, the court held that the petition could not be entertained due to lack of prosecution. The petition was therefore dismissed for non‑prosecution.

Issues considered

  • Whether a writ petition can proceed when the petitioners do not appear and fail to take steps to advance the petition

Subjects

  • writ petition
  • non‑prosecution
  • procedural default
  • Bombay High Court
  • criminal appellate jurisdiction

Judgment

                             sns                                                 83-wp-3551-2018.doc

                                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

                                            CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

                                              WRIT PETITION NO.3551 OF 2018

                      Jagmohan Ramdittamal Vhora & Anr.                           … Petitioners

                               V/s.

                      The State of Maharashtra                                    … Respondent




                      None for the Petitioners.
                      Smt. Madhavi H. Mhatre, APP, for the Respondent-State.


                                                        CORAM :        A. S. GADKARI AND
                                                                       KAMAL KHATA, JJ.
                                                           DATE :      12th June 2026

                      P.C.:-

                      1)              None for Petitioners when called out for hearing.

                      2)              Record indicates that, after 14th August, 2018, neither the

                      Petitioners nor their Advocate have taken any steps to circulate the Petition,

                      even once.

                      2.1)            It appears that, the Petitioners are not interested in pursuing

                      the Petition.

                      3)              Dismissed for non-prosecution.



                                   (KAMAL KHATA, J.)                    (A.S. GADKARI, J.)



         Digitally
                                                                                                       1/1
         signed by
         SUMEDH
SUMEDH   NAMDEO
NAMDEO   SONAWANE
SONAWANE Date:
         2026.06.17
         19:49:18
         +0530


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.