Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

ANIL JAISINGHANI AND ANR.versusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS.

Decided
Disposal
Dissmiss For Default/Non-Prosecution

Holding

The petition is dismissed for non‑prosecution.

Summary

The petitioners, Anil Jaisinghani & Anr., filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court challenging a decision of the State of Maharashtra. No petitioners appeared when called for hearing. The court noted that after 21 March 2018 the petitioners and/or their counsel made no effort to circulate the petition even once. It was observed that the petitioners appeared uninterested in pursuing the matter. Consequently, the court dismissed the petition for non‑prosecution.

Issues considered

  • Whether a writ petition can proceed when the petitioners fail to appear and take steps to pursue the petition

Subjects

  • writ petition
  • non‑prosecution
  • dismissal
  • criminal appellate jurisdiction
  • Bombay High Court

Judgment

                  ssm                                                    19-wp3554.2014.doc

                             IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

                                   CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

                                    WRIT PETITION NO. 3554 OF 2014

             Anil Jaisinghani & Anr.                               …..Petitioners

                      Vs.

             The State Of Maharashtra & Anr.                       …..Respondents

                                  ____________________________________

             None for the Petitioners.
             Mr. Vinod Chate APP, for the Respondent-State.

                                  ____________________________________

                                               CORAM :        A. S. GADKARI AND
                                                              R.M. JOSHI, JJ.
                                                  DATE :      12th FEBRUARY, 2026.
             P.C.:-

             1)              None for Petitioners when called out for hearing.

             2)              Record indicates that, after 21st March, 2018, Petitioners

             and/or their Advocate have not taken any steps to circulate the Petition,

             even for once.

             2.1)            It appears that, the Petitioners are not interested in pursuing

             the Petition.

             3)              Dismissed for non-prosecution.



                        (R.M. JOSHI, J.)                          (A.S. GADKARI, J.)

          Digitally signed
          by SANJIV
          SHARNAPPA
SANJIV    MASHALKAR
SHARNAPPA                                                                                     1/1
MASHALKAR Date:
          2026.02.16
          17:59:09
          +0530


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.