Bombay High Court
JAYESH VENGURLEKARversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA
- Decided
- Disposal
- Dissmiss For Default/Non-Prosecution
Holding
The petition is dismissed for non‑prosecution.
Summary
The petitioner filed a writ petition on 21 January 2019 but failed to appear for any hearing and did not take any steps to circulate the petition. The court noted that the petitioner showed no interest in pursuing the matter. Consequently, the court considered whether the petition could be dismissed for lack of prosecution. It held that the petition should be dismissed due to non‑prosecution. The petition was therefore dismissed.
Issues considered
- Whether a writ petition may be dismissed for non‑prosecution when the petitioner fails to appear or take steps to advance the petition.
Subjects
- writ petition
- non-prosecution
- dismissal
- court procedure
- high court
Judgment
DTG 78-wp356.2019.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO. 356 OF 2019
Jayesh Vengurlekar … Petitioner
V/s.
The State of Maharashtra … Respondent
_______________________________________
None for Petitioner.
Smt. P.P. Shinde, A.P.P. for Respondent-State.
_______________________________________
CORAM : A. S. GADKARI AND
KAMAL KHATA, JJ.
DATE : 17th June 2026
P.C. :
1) None for the Petitioner when called out for hearing.
2) Record indicates that, since the date of filing of the Petition i.e.
21st January 2019, neither the Petitioner nor his Advocate has taken any
steps to circulate the Petition, even once.
2.1) It appears that, the Petitioner is not interested in pursuing the
Petition.
3) Dismissed for non-prosecution.
( KAMAL KHATA, J. ) ( A.S. GADKARI, J. )
1/1
Checking your session…