Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

SAMAKI MATA SHIKSHAN PRASARAK MANDAL THROUGH ITS PRESIDENT AND OTHERSversusWAVHAL MILIND SHANKARRAO AND ANOTHER

Disposal
DISPOSED OFF

Holding

The petitions were held to be infructuous and were disposed of accordingly.

Summary

The Samaki Mata Shikshan Prasarak Mandal filed writ petitions (Nos. 3565 and 3619 of 2017) before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, seeking relief against the respondents. The petitioners argued that the matters were still pending and required adjudication. The respondents contended that a considerable lapse of time had occurred since the filing of the petitions. The Court observed that the passage of time had rendered the petitions infructuous, meaning no effective relief could be granted. Consequently, the Court disposed of both writ petitions as infructuous.

Issues considered

  • Whether the writ petitions remain maintainable despite the lapse of time since their filing

Subjects

  • writ petition
  • infructuous
  • limitation period
  • procedural law
  • High Court

Judgment

2026:BHC-AUG:16970
                                              1 of 1                      997-WP.3565.2017



                         IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                                    BENCH AT AURANGABAD

                               997 WRIT PETITION NO. 3565 OF 2017

                    SAMAKI MATA SHIKSHAN PRASARAK MANDAL THROUGH ITS
                                      PRESIDENT AND OTHERS
                                                VERSUS
                           WAVHAL MILIND SHANKARRAO AND ANOTHER
                                                   ...
                Mr. Sandip P. Rathod, Advocate for the Petitioners.
                Mr. D. R. Korde, AGP for Respondent-State.
                Mr. R. J. Godbole, Advocate for Respondent No.1.
                                                   ...
                                                 WITH
                                  WRIT PETITION NO. 3619 OF 2017

                    SAMAKI MATA SHIKSHAN PRASARAK MANDAL THROUGH ITS
                                      PRESIDENT AND OTHERS
                                                VERSUS
                       PATHAN IRSHAD KHAN SAMSHER KHAN AND ANOTHER
                                                  …
                Mr. Sandip P. Rathod, Advocate for the Petitioners.
                Mr. D. R. Korde, AGP for Respondent-State.
                Mr. R. J. Godbole, Advocate for Respondent No.1.
                                                   ...

                                       CORAM :         SIDDHESHWAR S. THOMBRE, J.
                                       DATE    :       18th APRIL, 2026
                P.C.:-

                1.       Mr. Sandip P. Rathod, learned Advocate for the Petitioners

                submits that due to passage of time, these matters have become

                infructuous.

                2.       In view thereof, the present petitions are disposed of as

                infructuous.

                                                (SIDDHESHWAR S. THOMBRE, J.)


      Tauseef


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.