Bombay High Court

ANGAD DAGDU GHOLAPversusVINAYAK RAMBHAU MOLWANE AND OTHERS

Disposal: DISPOSED OFF
Bench: ABASAHEB D SHINDE

Holding

The High Court upheld the order of the learned Joint Civil Judge and dismissed the writ petition.

Summary

The petitioner, Angad Dagdu Gholap, filed a writ petition challenging the order dated 17 November 2014 of the Joint Civil Judge Junior Division, Washi, which rejected his amendment application in R.C.S. No. 264 of 2013. The High Court examined the impugned order and the arguments of counsel. The Court found no error in the lower court’s decision to reject the amendment. Consequently, the petition was held to be without merit. The writ petition was dismissed.

Issues considered

The order of the Joint Civil Judge rejecting the amendment application is erroneous
Whether the writ petition challenging that order should be entertained

Subjects

writ petition
amendment of suit
Civil Procedure Code
order dismissal
jurisdiction

Judgment

2026:BHC-AUG:14931
                                                  1                         915.doc



                         IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                                  BENCH AT AURANGABAD
                         915 WRIT PETITION NO. 3573 OF 2015

                               ANGAD DAGDU GHOLAP
                                     VERSUS
                      VINAYAK RAMBHAU MOLWANE AND OTHERS
                                            ...


           Advocate for the Petitioner : Mr. D.S. Bhapkar h/f. Mr. Salunke V.D.
                                             …
                                         CORAM        : ABASAHEB D. SHINDE, J.
                                           DATE       : 08.04.2026
             PER COURT :
             .        The petitioner takes an exception to the order dated 17.11.2014
             passed by the learned Joint Civil Judge Junior Division, Washi rejecting
             the application below Exh.60 filed in R.C.S. No.264 of 2013 thereby,
             rejecting the amendment application filed by the petitioner.

             2.       After having heard learned counsel for the petitioner and after
             perusal of the order impugned, I do not find any error in the impugned
             order.

             3.       As such, the Writ Petition is devoid of any substance and the
             same stands dismissed.



                                                      ( ABASAHEB D. SHINDE, J. )




   vsj..

Continue reading with your account

Checking your session…