Created by Fuzzy Cloud | Our 2nd AI-Powered Solution
273 judgments · newest first · showing 1–200
The petitioner, Surekha Ranjit Rathod, filed a criminal writ petition alleging that her daughter had left home because the petitioner wanted to arrange her marriage to another person. The respondent State filed an FIR and charge sheet, and the missing girl was initially placed under the custody of …
The Hindustani Education Society filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, seeking relief. The petitioners submitted a list dated 01.07.2026 showing that petitioner No.3's name had been entered in the Shalarth ID, marked for identification. The court held that the …
Mayur Maroti Akulwar, through his natural guardian, filed a writ petition seeking a court direction for the speedy determination of his claim that he belongs to the Mannervarlu Scheduled Tribe, a claim pending since 24 March 2025. He required a caste validity certificate to appear for the NEET …
Shri Makradhwaj Shikshan Sanstha and Maharashtra Academy of Engineering and Research MIT filed writ petitions before the Bombay High Court seeking that the State of Maharashtra release a grant‑in‑aid dated 1 November 2020. The petitioners contended that the matter could be decided by Respondent No. …
The petitioner, Ashok Suryawanshi, sought recognition as a member of the Scheduled Tribe ‘Thakur’ and challenged the Scrutiny Committee’s order that invalidated his claim on the grounds of area restriction and failure to satisfy the affinity test. He produced pre‑independence school records of his …
The petitioner, Rekha Prabhakar Pansare, filed a writ petition but had superannuated on 31 May 2026, with all her benefits already granted. The court examined whether any relief remained to be granted. Finding that no benefits or rights survived post‑superannuation, the court held the petition to be …
The petitioner, an injured eyewitness (PW‑3), filed Criminal Application No. 82 of 2026 seeking condonation of a 22‑day delay in filing a criminal appeal against his conviction. The appeal of another accused in the same case had already been admitted by the court. The application argued that the …
The petitioners, Damu Ashruba Pachunde and others, filed a contempt petition (Contempt Petition No. 26 of 2016) before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, seeking relief against the State of Maharashtra. The petition alleged that an order of the court had been contravened, leading to contempt …
The petitioners, Shivlal Seva Rathod and another, filed a petition seeking rental compensation from the State of Maharashtra. The State, through its Additional Government Pleader, submitted that an order determining the compensation had been passed in 2015 and that a direction for payment was …
The petitioner, convicted of murder under IPC s.302 and sentenced to life imprisonment, applied for parole leave on humanitarian grounds, citing his daughter's serious illness and a willing surety. The parole applications were rejected by the prison authorities on the grounds of a negative police …
The petitioner, Avinash Jairam Pakalwad, filed a writ petition seeking protection from his employer's show‑cause notice that threatened termination for not producing a tribe‑validity certificate. The petitioner’s claim of belonging to the Mannervarlu Scheduled Tribe has been pending before the …
Uttam S/o Sahebrao Salve filed a contempt petition against Manukumar Srivastava. The petitioner’s counsel, Mr. S.K. Mathpati and Mr. Sandeep B. Sontakke, submitted that the order of contempt had been fully complied with. The respondents, represented by Mr. S.J. Salgare, were not required to appear …
The petitioner, Prabhat Sheku Narwade, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court seeking relief against the State of Maharashtra and other respondents. During the hearing, the advocate for respondent No. 3 informed the Court that the payment sought by the petitioner had already been made. …
The petitioners, who are primary and secondary education officers employed by the Zilla Parishad, filed writ petitions alleging denial of salary benefits under the one‑step pay scale applicable to employees working in Tribal and PESA areas, as per the Government Resolution dated 29‑02‑2024. The …
The petitioners, employees deployed in tribal and PESA areas, filed writ petitions seeking salary benefits under the one‑step pay scale and arrears as per the Government Resolution dated 29‑02‑2024. The State of Maharashtra and the Education Officer opposed, contending procedural issues. The Court …
The petitioners, representing the estates of two deceased individuals, filed a writ petition against the State of Maharashtra seeking redress of pending representations dated 15 November 1995, 11 December 2024 and 12 December 2024. The High Court examined whether the State was obligated to consider …
The petitioner, Ganesh Basweshwar Pattewad, sought protection from his employer who issued a show‑cause notice demanding a caste validity certificate, alleging that his claim of belonging to the Mannervarlu Scheduled Tribe was pending before the Scrutiny Committee since 2016. The State, through the …
The petitioner, Nandkishor Pannalal Oswal, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court challenging the failure of Respondent No.4 to decide his representation dated 18 April 2022. The petition alleged that despite a report submitted by the Additional Collector on 6 June 2022, no decision had …
The petitioner, Durgaprasad Omprakash Mishra, sought extension of a 28‑day furlough leave granted on 25‑09‑2025, arguing that the leave expired because Respondent No.3 (the Tehsildar) failed to process the required surety bond. The respondents contended that once the furlough period lapses, it …
The petitioner, Muktai Kishore Jadhav, filed a writ petition seeking a direction for the Scrutiny Committee (Respondent No.2) to decide his claim of belonging to the ‘Thakur’ Scheduled Tribe, a matter pending since 12 September 2025. The petitioner argued that a prompt decision was essential for his …
Rekha Adevappa Chakre filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, seeking that the State of Maharashtra provide certain information. The petitioners alleged that the information was essential for proceeding with a proposal. The Court examined whether the State, as a public …
The petitioner challenged the order of the Tribe Certificate Scrutiny Committee that invalidated his claim to belong to the ‘Thakur’ Scheduled Tribe. He argued that genealogical evidence and prior validity certificates granted to his cousins and relatives demonstrated his entitlement. The State …
The petitioner, Vaishnavi Ramchandra Nirde, filed a writ petition seeking a court direction for the Caste Scrutiny Committee to decide her pending tribe claim, which has been under consideration since 09/09/2025. She required a validity certificate before 30/06/2026 to pursue higher studies. The …
Petitioner Yogesh Chandrakumar Kasarle filed a writ petition seeking a direction to the Tribe Scrutiny Committee to decide his claim of belonging to the Mannervarlu tribe promptly, as he requires a validity certificate for his studies by the end of June 2026. The petitioner argued that the delay in …
The appellant sought to amend his criminal appeal to challenge the order framing a charge against him, arguing that he could still be discharged. The State contended that once a charge is framed under Section 228 of the CrPC, discharge under Sections 216 or 227 is no longer permissible. The Court …
The petitioner, Smt. Pushpa, filed a civil application seeking condonation of delay in filing a writ petition against Mahatma Phule Krishi Vidyapeeth. The application argued that the delay was justified and requested permission to amend the writ petition. The High Court examined whether the delay …
The petitioner, Mohammad Taqi Sirajoddin, filed three criminal applications before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench. Subsequently, the petitioner, through counsel Ms. U. T. Pathan, sought to withdraw all the pending applications. The court was asked to consider whether the applications could …
The petitioners, three brothers, challenged the Scrutiny Committee’s order dated 19‑12‑2025 that invalidated their claim to belong to the Mannervarlu Scheduled Tribe. They relied on a prior judgment granting conditional validity of a tribe certificate to their sister, Shweta, in Writ Petition No. …
The petitioner, Pragati Vishwas Kshirsagar, filed a writ petition seeking an expeditious decision on his claim of belonging to the ‘Koli Mahadev’ Scheduled Tribe, a claim pending since December 2024. He required the tribe validity certificate to pursue higher studies. The petitioner’s counsel …
The petition was filed by the guardian of a minor, Atharv Rahul Chilwar, claiming that the petitioner belongs to the Mannervarlu Scheduled Tribe. The claim has been pending before the State's Scrutiny Committee since 13 November 2025. The petitioner sought speedy verification to pursue higher …
The petitioner, Atmaram Pandurang ChorMale, challenged the order of the Tribe Scrutiny Committee that rejected his claim of belonging to the Dhanwar Scheduled Tribe. He submitted two documents—a 1945 birth certificate of his father and a 1951 mortgage deed of his grandfather indicating the Dhanwar …
Petitioner Pradeep Hukumchand Chudiwal filed a criminal writ petition before the Bombay High Court seeking a direction that the Police Complaint Authority (PCA) under Section 22P of the Maharashtra Police Act expedite the hearing of his complaint. The petitioner’s counsel requested leave to add an …
The petitioners, Prakash Gunwantrao Deshmukh and others, filed a civil application before the Bombay High Court seeking condonation of delay in their proceedings. The State of Maharashtra, as respondent, opposed the relief. The court examined the reasons for the delay and the merits of the prayer …
Manoj Sadashiv Choudhary filed a criminal writ petition seeking a direction to the Superintendent of Police, Beed, to decide a representation dated 12 January 2026. The petitioner argued that his earlier representation on the same matter had been rejected by the Court on its merits. The learned …
The petitioners, Vikas Ratanlal Jain and others, filed a criminal writ petition challenging an unspecified grievance against the State of Maharashtra. The High Court, after hearing counsel, directed the petitioners to approach the State Police Complaint Authority to seek redress. The petitioners' …
Nitin Bhaskar Lobhe filed Criminal Writ Petition No. 191 of 2026 in the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, against Ganesh Shinde and others. The petitioner, through counsel, later expressed a desire to withdraw the petition. The court considered the request and, finding no objection, allowed the …
The petitioner, a student, challenged an order dated 19 November 2025 by the Scheduled Tribe Certificate Scrutiny Committee that disposed of his tribe claim on the ground of alleged non‑co‑operation. The petitioner asserted that he would appear before the committee on 26 February 2026 and cooperate …
The petitioner, Chhatrapati Shivaji Education Society, filed a contempt petition against the State of Maharashtra. The petition arose from a proposal that had already been decided by the court. The High Court examined whether any aspect of the petition survived the earlier decision. It held that, …
The petitioner, Manoj Kumar Indrasing Patil, filed a contempt petition (Continuing Petition No. 115 of 2017) against the State of Maharashtra and others. The petitioner’s counsel stated that the petitioner had not been in contact, suggesting that the order underlying the contempt claim had been …
The petitioners, employees of the Zilla Parishad, filed writ petitions alleging denial of salary benefits under the one‑step pay scale applicable to staff serving in Tribal and PESA areas, as per Government Resolution dated 29‑02‑2024. The respondents, the State of Maharashtra, contested the claim. …
The petitioners, employees of the Zilla Parishad, filed writ petitions seeking salary benefits under the one‑step pay scale applicable to staff serving in Tribal and PESA areas, invoking a Government Resolution dated 29‑02‑2024. The respondents, the State of Maharashtra and related authorities, …
The petitioners, employees of the Zilla Parishad, challenged the denial of salary benefits and the one‑step pay scale applicable to staff serving in Tribal and PESA areas, invoking a Government Resolution dated 29‑02‑2024. The High Court noted that the matter had already been decided by its …
The petitioners, employees deployed in primary and secondary schools in tribal and PESA areas of Maharashtra, filed writ petitions seeking salary benefits under the one‑step pay scale and arrears as per the Government Resolution dated 29‑02‑2024. The State of Maharashtra and the Education Officer …
Petitioner Rajeshkumar Narayan Kottapalli filed a writ petition seeking speedy disposal of his claim of belonging to the Mannervarlu Scheduled Tribe, which had been pending before the Scrutiny Committee since April 2, 2018. The Court examined whether the prolonged delay infringed the petitioner's …
Two writ petitions filed by government employees sought the benefit of advance increments that were allegedly discontinued by the State of Maharashtra. The petitioners argued that the Government Resolution dated 24‑08‑2017 and the subsequent circular of 04‑09‑2018 should have retrospective effect, …
The petitioners filed multiple writ petitions seeking speedy disposal of their pending tribe claims before the Scrutiny Committee, which had been pending since 28 March 2025. They submitted that a Vigilance Cell enquiry had been completed and the report was already with the Committee, with a …
The petitioners filed multiple writ petitions seeking speedy disposal of their pending tribe claims before the Scrutiny Committee, which had been pending since 28 March 2025. They submitted that a Vigilance Cell enquiry report had already been filed and that they would file replies to the report on …
The petitioners filed a civil application seeking condonation of delay in filing and removal of office objections. The court examined the reasons provided in the application and considered the applicable procedural provisions. It determined that the delay was justified and could be condoned upon …
The petitioner, Nagesh Vyankati Pentewad, filed a writ petition seeking a validity certificate for his studies, contingent upon recognition of his claim to belong to the Mannervarlu Scheduled Tribe. The claim has been pending before the Scrutiny Committee since 23 January 2025. The petitioner argued …
The petitioner, Sundarrao Shankarrao Thombre, filed Writ Petition No. 137 of 2018 in the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench. The petitioner, through counsel Mr. Tanwade Vikas S., sought leave of the court to withdraw the petition. The sole issue before the court was whether the petitioner could be …
The petitioners, former landowners affected by the Tembhapuri Medium Project, filed a writ petition seeking quashing of a government letter, allocation of alternative land, and compensation for land acquired between 1981 and 1987. They relied on a 1974 Government Resolution and argued that the …
The petitioners, Prakash Vyankat Sarje and another, filed a civil application seeking continuation of interim protection previously granted by the High Court on 20 March 2025. That protection had been discontinued on 20 June 2025. The respondents, the State of Maharashtra, raised no strong objection …
The petitioners, Sudhakar Shrimant Sarje and another, filed a civil application seeking continuation of interim protection that the Bombay High Court had granted on 20 March 2025 but which lapsed on 20 June 2025. The State of Maharashtra, represented by its Secretary, did not raise any strong …
The petitioner, Namdeo Keshavrao Pawar, filed a civil application before the Bombay High Court seeking condonation of delay in his proceedings against the State of Maharashtra and others. The application relied on a specific prayer clause (Clause “C”) requesting that the court excuse the delay and …
The petitioner, a 22‑year‑old service employee, filed a writ petition seeking protection from disciplinary action by his employer for not producing a Scheduled Tribe (ST) validity certificate, as his claim of belonging to the "Tokre Koli" tribe was pending before the Scheduled Tribe Certificate …
Karbhari Kishan Gawali applied for bail to attend his granddaughter's marriage scheduled from 20th to 22nd February 2026. He submitted the marriage invitation and police confirmation of the event. The Court considered the request and, while acknowledging the personal reason, limited the bail period …
The petitioners, Omkar Subhash Sabanwad and Gayatri Subhash Sabanwad, applied for a Tribe Certificate as members of the Koli Mahadev Scheduled Tribe, which was rejected by the Sub Divisional Officer on 31‑Oct‑2025. They filed appeals to the Scrutiny Committee under Section 5(1) of the Maharashtra …
The petitioners, Omkar Subhash Sabanwad and Gayatri Subhash Sabanwad, applied for a Tribe Certificate as members of the Koli Mahadev Scheduled Tribe, but the Sub‑Divisional Officer in Dharmabad rejected their application on 31‑Oct‑2025. They filed appeals under Section 5(1) of the Maharashtra …
The petitioner, Gajanan Prakash Pothkantwar, filed a continuous petition (No. 139 of 2015) challenging an order passed by the Education Officer. The petitioner later informed the court that, due to a subsequent event, there was nothing left to pursue in the petition. The court, upon hearing the …
The petitioner, Satish Nivrutti Chavan, challenged the order dated 26‑02‑2007 of the Scrutiny Committee which invalidated his claim of belonging to the Thakar Scheduled Tribe. He argued that, during the pendency of the writ petition, he obtained his grandfather's school records and other …
Balaji Nagorao Yadpalwar filed a writ petition seeking the court’s intervention to expedite the determination of his claim of belonging to the Mannervarlu Scheduled Tribe, which has been pending before the Scrutiny Committee since 4 December 2025. He was appointed as an Attendant and, under Clause …
Harish Laxman Sudewad filed a writ petition seeking a court direction to the Scrutiny Committee to determine his claim of belonging to the Mannervarlu Scheduled Tribe, a matter that had been pending since 11 July 2025. The petitioner argued that the delay was impeding his plans for higher studies. …
The petitioner, Nishikant Vishwe, challenged the order of the Tribe Certificate Scrutiny Committee dated 03‑08‑2012 which rejected his claim to belong to the ‘Thakur’ Scheduled Tribe. He argued that his genealogical ties to several relatives—Ranjak, Padmakar, Pravin and Nilesh—who had previously …
The petitioners, who purchased portions of Gut No. 127 in Jalna, sought to quash a communication dated 16‑06‑2025 issued by the Deputy Superintendent of Police (Economic Wing) directing the Sub Registrar to prohibit further transfer of the land. They argued that they were not accused under the …
The petitioners, education officers employed by the Zilla Parishad, filed writ petitions seeking salary benefits under the one‑step pay scale applicable to employees working in Tribal and PESA areas, as per the Government Resolution dated 29‑02‑2024. The issue was whether the respondents were …
The State of Maharashtra filed a writ petition challenging an order of the Maharashtra Administrative Tribunal that had directed the State to release the respondent's gratuity and regular pension while his appeal against an acquittal was pending. The respondent, Bhimrao Namdeo More, had been …
The petitioner, Balaji Karhade, challenged the Scrutiny Committee's order that rejected his claim to belong to the Mannervarlu Scheduled Tribe. He relied on validity certificates issued to his blood relatives and a prior conditional validation granted to a relative in Writ Petition No. 9830 of 2023. …
The petitioner, Akash Ahok Auti, filed a writ petition seeking the issuance of a tribe certificate in the correct format, claiming he already possessed a certificate dated 23.05.2003 and only required a replacement. The respondent State, through the competent authority, had rejected the application …
The petitioners, a group of parents, filed a writ petition alleging that the State Education Department officials (respondents Nos.3 and 4) refused to accept proposals submitted by the school management and headmaster on 17‑January‑2024. The petitioners contended that the proposals must be …
The petitioner, Suresh Haribhau Hajare, challenged a Scrutiny Committee order dated 04‑03‑2026 that invalidated his claim to belong to the ‘Koli Mahadev’ Scheduled Tribe. The petition was filed under Article 226 of the Constitution seeking a tribe‑validity certificate. The Court noted that a …
The petitioner, Nitin Babanrao Shankpal, filed a writ petition challenging a Scrutiny Committee order that invalidated his claim to belong to the “Thakur” Scheduled Tribe. He relied on earlier judgments that granted conditional validity to his close blood relatives – his cousin uncle Dinesh Bapurao …
The petitioner, Pratap Mukundrao Phadke, filed a writ petition seeking a direction to the District Caste Certificate Scrutiny Committee to decide a complaint against Shaikh Rijwan Chotubhai expeditiously. The petitioner argued that the Committee had already issued notices to both parties, and only a …
Petitioner Rahul Sahebrao Chabukswar filed a criminal writ petition before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, challenging actions of the State of Maharashtra and others. During the hearing, the petitioner's counsel, Mr. Imale Ramesh Ramdas, requested to withdraw the petition. The Court …
Mahajan Devidas Tandalwad filed a writ petition seeking direction for the speedy verification of his claim that he belongs to the Mannervarlu Scheduled Tribe, a matter pending before the State's caste scrutiny committee since September 15, 2025. The petitioner argued that the delay adversely …
The petitioners, employees deployed in primary and secondary education in tribal and PESA areas, claimed they were denied salary benefits under the one‑step pay scale and related arrears as per a Government Resolution dated 29‑02‑2024. They filed multiple writ petitions challenging the denial of …
Gondibai Mukhi Pawara filed a writ petition challenging the validity certificate issued by Respondent No.3 on 23 August 2015, alleging that it was obtained through fraud on the Scrutiny Committee. The petitioner lodged a complaint with the Scrutiny Committee on 31 July 2023, but the committee failed …
The petitioners, who are primary and secondary education officers employed by the Zilla Parishad, claimed they were not receiving salary benefits under the one‑step pay scale applicable to employees working in Tribal and PESA areas, despite a Government Resolution dated 29‑02‑2024. They filed a …
The petitioner, Vaishnavi Dattatray Thakur, filed a writ petition seeking speedy disposal of her claim of belonging to the ‘Thakur’ Scheduled Tribe, which had been pending before the Scrutiny Committee since 4 December 2024. She required a validity certificate to continue her studies. The High …
The petitioners, Sarthak Chaganlal Sabale and another, filed a writ petition seeking a court direction to the State's Scrutiny Committee to decide their claims of belonging to the Naikda Scheduled Tribe, a matter pending since 16 January 2026. They required a decision before the NEET‑UG 2026 …
The petitioner, Roshan Prabhakar Mutyepod, challenged a 10 July 2018 order of the Scrutiny Committee that invalidated his claim of belonging to the Mannervarlu Scheduled Tribe. Although the petition was filed after a considerable delay, the Court required the petitioner to deposit Rs.1,00,000 to …
The Ka Krishnarao Narayanrao Pawar Education Trust filed a petition (1000 Cont. Petition No. 717 of 2025) against the State of Maharashtra challenging an order of contempt. The petitioner, through counsel, informed the court that the contempt order had been fully complied with. The court examined …
Suresh Tukaram More filed a continuous petition (No. 545 of 2016) arising out of WP/8247/2013 before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench. The petitioner alleged that the State of Maharashtra had not complied with an earlier contempt order. The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that …
Yusufkhan Sikandar Khan filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, challenging the delay in deciding his representation dated 12 June 2025. The petition sought a directive for the State of Maharashtra, specifically respondent No.5, to adjudicate the representation. The …
The petitioner, a minor represented by her mother, filed a writ petition seeking a court direction for the Scrutiny Committee to determine her claim of belonging to the ‘Koli Mahadev’ Scheduled Tribe, a matter that had been pending since 4 September 2025. The petitioner argued that a prompt decision …
The petitioners, Pradip Chandrakant Mekhe and others, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad bench, which later faced procedural delays. They moved a civil application seeking condonation of the delay, arguing that the lapse should not prejudice their substantive rights. The …
The petitioner, a police officer, filed a writ petition challenging an order of the State Information Commission that directed the Information Officer to disclose his service record to a third party who had sought the information under the RTI Act to verify the petitioner’s caste certificate. The …
The petitioners filed a writ petition seeking relief concerning the password of the 'Shalarth ID' of Saraswatibai Secondary School and the timely disbursement of salary. The Respondent State, through its Additional Government Pleader, submitted that the password has already been reset and that the …
Vishakha and Ganpat, niece and uncle, filed writ petitions challenging a Scrutiny Committee order that invalidated their claims of belonging to the Mannervarlu Scheduled Tribe. They relied on a prior judgment (Writ Petition No.11596 of 2023) that had granted conditional validity to distant relatives …
The petitioners, a niece and her uncle, challenged a March 19, 2025 order of the Scheduled Tribe Certificate Verification Committee that invalidated their claim to belong to the Mannervarlu Scheduled Tribe. They relied on genealogical records and the earlier judgment in Writ Petition No.11596 of …
Mahesh Chandrakant Ukhrande filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, challenging actions of the Union of India and other respondents. The petition was presented by Advocate Mr. Annasaheb R. Barate, while the respondents were represented by Ms. N. B. Kamble (AGP) and Mr. …
The petitioners, Varad Gopal Nikam and another, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, seeking relief against the State of Maharashtra. The petitioner’s counsel, Ms. Kalpana Kulkarni Sonpawale, later applied for permission to withdraw the petition, requesting liberty …
Manisha Sanjeevkumar Dalvi filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, seeking a direction against the State of Maharashtra to decide on a proposal she submitted on 30 January 2026, which had been forwarded by the Education Officer. The petition alleged that the concerned …
The petitioner, Rukmin Sonaji Totewad, filed a writ petition seeking a direction to the Scrutiny Committee to decide his claim of belonging to the Mannervarlu Scheduled Tribe. He alleged that his employer had issued a show‑cause notice demanding a tribe‑validity certificate, threatening termination …
The petitioners filed Writ Petition No. 6548 of 2026 in the High Court of Bombay, Aurangabad Bench, seeking relief against the State of Maharashtra. The petition was listed before a two‑Judge Bench comprising Justice Nitin B. Suryawanshi and Justice Abasaheb D. Shinde. No arguments were advanced by …
Satish Rajaram Pimparkar filed a writ petition seeking a direction to the State of Maharashtra (respondent No.5) to provide labour for completing a concrete road work under a work order. The petitioner alleged that the work was incomplete and required judicial intervention. The Court examined the …
The petitioner, Vishnu Lekhraj Tanwani, filed a criminal writ petition seeking a direction that the Commissioner of Police, Chhatrapati Sambhajinagar, decide a complaint/representation he lodged on 30‑December‑2025. The respondent State, through its APP, indicated that the Commissioner would decide …
The petitioners, employees of the Zilla Parishad, filed writ petitions alleging denial of salary benefits under the one‑step pay scale applicable to staff serving in Tribal and PESA areas, as per a Government Resolution dated 29‑02‑2024. The respondents, the State of Maharashtra, had not granted the …
The petitioners, members of the Mannervarlu community, sought validation of their Scheduled Tribe status and issuance of caste certificates. Their applications were rejected by the Scrutiny Committee, prompting them to file multiple writ petitions. The Court noted that a relative, Shankar s/o Laxman …
The petitioners, members of the Surewad family, claimed belonging to the Mannervarlu Scheduled Tribe and sought validation of their caste certificates. Their applications were rejected by the State's Scrutiny Committee, prompting multiple writ petitions before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad …
The petitioner, Shivaji Dinkarrao Jadhav, filed a contempt petition (Contempt Petition No. 209 of 2014) challenging an interim order dated 30 April 2010 passed in Writ Petition No. 3971 of 2010. The petition was scheduled for hearing, but the petitioner failed to appear even after a second call, and …
The petitioners Harshvardhan Baliram Tayade and others filed a writ petition seeking a decision on their representations dated 21 October 2024 and 13 April 2026 submitted to the Chief Executive Officer (respondent No.5). They claimed the CEO had not acted despite a Government Resolution dated 18 …
The petitioners, members of the Mannervarlu community, sought recognition as a Scheduled Tribe and validation of their caste certificates. Their applications were previously rejected by the Scrutiny Committee, prompting multiple writ petitions. The Court noted that a related petition by Shankar s/o …
Smt. Sakkarbai Shrinivas Sarda filed a writ petition seeking direction to the Collector and Superintendent of Excise in Ahilyanagar to implement a 2016 order of the Minister of State Excise concerning the renewal of her excise licence. The respondents produced letters and an order dated 24‑02‑2025 …
The petitioner, a minor represented by her father, filed a writ petition seeking a court direction for the Scheduled Tribe Certificate Scrutiny Committee to expedite the determination of his claim of belonging to the Koli Mahadev tribe. The claim had been pending since 29 May 2025, and the …
The petitioners filed a writ petition challenging a final award dated 13 September 2021 issued by respondent No.3. They argued that they have an alternate efficacious remedy under Section 34 of the Maharashtra Industrial Development Act, 1961. The learned Additional Government Pleader submitted that …
Vilas Laxmanrao Dadpe filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, challenging the inaction of the Collector of Dharashiv regarding a representation dated 02 September 2025. The petitioner, represented by Mr. S.T. Bhimale (on behalf of Mr. S.S. Kulkarni), sought a directive …
Shrimant Laxman Gadekar filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, challenging actions of the City and Industrial Development Corporation Ltd. The Court, after hearing, indicated it was not inclined to grant the relief sought. On the Court's direction, the petitioner's …
Petitioners Pavan More and another filed Criminal Writ Petition No. 664 of 2019 before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, challenging certain actions of the State of Maharashtra. Their counsel, Mr. Akshay Wagh on behalf of Mr. Shelke Shivaji T., applied for leave to withdraw the petition. The …
The petitioners filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court seeking a decision on their representation dated 09 January 2023, which the respondent had not yet acted upon. The petition alleged undue delay and violation of their right to a timely administrative decision. The Court examined …
The petitioner, Annasaheb R. Abhale, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court challenging the inaction of the State of Maharashtra and other respondents regarding his representation dated 06/04/2026. The petition sought a directive for the respondents to consider the representation on its …
The applicant, Jaganath Govindrao Phulare, sought the withdrawal of the full amount of an arbitration award of Rs.14,31,37,791 dated 28 December 2018, which had previously been challenged under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 and dismissed. The respondent, the Union of …
A batch of writ petitions (Nos. 6096‑6099, 6100‑6109 of 2017) were filed against the State of Maharashtra alleging various grievances. All petitioners' tenures had expired in 2020, rendering the subject matter of the petitions moot. The Court examined whether relief could be granted when the …
A batch of writ petitions (Nos. 6096‑6099, 6100‑6109 of 2017) were filed against the State of Maharashtra alleging various grievances. All petitioners' tenures had expired in 2020, rendering the subject matter of the petitions moot. The Court examined whether relief could be granted when the …
The petitioners, Ramavtar Sagarmal Saboo and others, filed writ petitions challenging actions of the State of Maharashtra. The respondents, the State, contested the petitions. During proceedings, the petitioners informed the court that the parties had reached an amicable settlement, rendering the …
The Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, considered a batch of writ petitions filed in 2017. All petitioners were government officials whose tenures had already expired in 2020. The Court observed that since the petitioners no longer held the positions from which the relief was sought, the petitions …
A batch of writ petitions (Nos. 6096‑6099, 6100‑6109 of 2017) were filed against the State of Maharashtra alleging various grievances. All petitioners' tenures had expired in 2020, rendering the subject matter of the petitions moot. The Court examined whether relief could be granted when the …
The Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, considered a batch of writ petitions filed in 2017. All petitioners were government officials whose tenures had already expired in 2020. The Court observed that since the petitioners no longer held the positions from which the relief was sought, the petitions …
The petitioner, Dnyaneswar Pralhadrao Renge, filed a writ petition seeking inclusion in the Shalarth Pranali and issuance of a Shalarth ID. The Court observed that the issues raised were identical to those decided in Writ Petition No.1520/2026 dated 04.03.2026. Relying on that precedent, the Court …
The petitioner, Shaikh Aref Namdar, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court seeking relief regarding an application he had submitted to the State Information Commission on 22 July 2025. The petition alleged that the Commission had not yet decided the application. The Court examined …
The petitioners filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, seeking a correction to an order dated 22 June 2026. They contended that the terms "Divisional Commissioner" and "Rule 13" in the first two paragraphs of the order were erroneous and should be replaced with "Chief …
The petitioners, Shubham Jaiprakash Pagare and others, filed a contempt petition seeking enforcement of a direction that the respondents consider their representation for a scholarship in the Aircraft Maintenance course. The Court had earlier, on 10 February 2025, granted the petitioners liberty to …
The petitioners, legal heirs of the deceased Sheshrao Kishanrao Bhalerao, filed a writ petition challenging an order dated 12.10.2022 issued by the District Magistrate/Collector, Hingoli, which handed over possession of immovable property to them. The petitioners argued that the order was passed …
Nandkumar Ganpat Lawande filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, challenging actions of the State of Maharashtra and the District Magistrate, Ahilyanagar. The petition sought relief, but the court did not grant the specific relief claimed. Instead, the judges granted …
The petitioner, Nanasaheb Eknath Bade, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court seeking relief against the State of Maharashtra. The petition was filed after a considerable lapse of time, and the court observed that due to the passage of time, no material or relief remained viable in the …
Petitioners Rushikesh Ashok Jadhav and Smt. Kalpana Digambar Walke filed writ petitions before the Bombay High Court seeking a decision on proposals they submitted on 24 March 2023. The respondents, the State of Maharashtra and its officials, had not yet ruled on these proposals. The petitioners …
The case concerned the death of Namdeo Dnyanba Motekar and involved a civil application and writ petition filed against the Union of India and other respondents. The applicant sought relief and an amendment as specified in Clause B of the prayer. The High Court of Bombay, Aurangabad Bench, heard the …
The petitioner, Trupti Jayantrao Lalsare, filed a civil application and a writ petition (WP/1757/2025) against the State of Maharashtra. The applicant's counsel argued that the civil application should be rendered infructuous. The Court agreed and disposed of the civil application. The writ petition …
The petitioners, retired government employees, sought monetary benefits and recalculation of their pensionary benefits, claiming they were entitled to higher pensions based on the last drawn salary and annual increments. The State argued that the petitioners were not eligible for interest on arrears …
The petitioner, Aarti Salve, filed a writ petition seeking a direction to the school (Respondent No.1) to hand over her minor daughter Avantika's leaving certificate. The background is a mutual‑consent divorce decree from the Family Court, Dhule, which awarded custody of the daughter to the husband …
The petitioners, a group of former government employees, filed writ petitions challenging the calculation of their pension benefits after superannuation, alleging that the State of Maharashtra had not incorporated the annual increment of their last drawn salary. The High Court examined whether the …
The petitioners, former government employees of Maharashtra, filed writ petitions challenging the calculation of their pensionary benefits after superannuation. They contended that the pension should reflect the actual salary, including the annual increment, and that they were entitled to any …
The petitioner, Suyog Seva Pratishthan, filed a writ petition seeking a direction for the State of Maharashtra to decide a proposal dated 06‑01‑2006. The petition was filed more than 18 years after the date of the proposal. The Court held that such a long delay precludes entertaining the petition. …
Sheshrao Dattshetti Tuptewar filed a writ petition seeking to quash an order of the State Bank of India's Deputy Managing Director and to compel the bank and its officials to follow a 2013 circular on the rotation-based allocation of cases to panel advocates, including himself. The petitioner argued …
In Writ Petition No.7643 of 2026, the petitioner, Sachin Ratnakar Deshmukh, moved a motion before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, seeking correction of a clerical error in the order dated 22/07/2026. The petitioner contended that the date mentioned in the second line of the first paragraph, …
Two writ petitions were filed by groups of students against the State of Maharashtra challenging the non‑implementation of directions issued by the District Level Grievance Redressal Committee, Latur, dated 18 September 2025. The petitioners, represented by Mr. Shirsat Suhas R, sought a court order …
The petitioners filed three contempt petitions (Nos. 305, 306, 307 of 2014) alleging that the respondents, Sanjay Kumar and others, had failed to comply with a prior contempt order. The State, through its Additional Government Pleaders, filed affidavits stating that the contempt order had been fully …
The petitioner, Swati Bhagwan Hange, filed a writ petition seeking a court direction to the State of Maharashtra, respondent No.2, to decide a proposal she submitted on 1 August 2025 within a stipulated time. The petitioner argued that the delay in decision violated her rights. The respondent, …
Sunil Ramkrishna Koli filed a civil application against the State of Maharashtra, which was delayed in filing. The High Court examined whether the delay could be condoned and the application allowed. It found that the delay was excusable and permitted the application in accordance with prayer Clause …
The petitioner, Rukmabai Laxman Khokle, filed a writ petition challenging a February 2025 order that effected a ‘no‑confidence motion’ against her under the Maharashtra Village Panchayats Act, 1959, and a subsequent April 2025 order by the District Collector dismissing her appeal. She alleged …
The applicant, Ashish Chandan Imale, filed a civil application seeking condonation of delay in his proceedings against the Union of India and others. The court examined whether the delay could be condoned under the applicable procedural rules. Relying on the submissions and the merits of the …
The applicant university sought modification of an ad‑interim order that had barred it from finalising the appointment of a professor after an interview held on 1 July 2026. The university argued that the interview result was pending and it should be allowed to declare the result and complete the …
Syed Afroz Begum and others filed a writ petition challenging an order dated 10 June 2022 that altered their pay scale. The petition contended that Clause‑3 of a Government Resolution dated 13 October 2016 was discriminatory and violated Article 14 of the Constitution. The Court observed that the …
Petitioner Parmeshwar Bhaidas Deore filed a contempt petition against Nivedita Ved Singhal and others. No counsel appeared for the petitioner, and the respondents filed a reply indicating that the order in the contempt proceedings had been complied with. The Court examined the reply and found that …
Mohan Kisanrao Bhosale and another filed a writ petition challenging the delay in deciding their representation dated 22 June 2026. They sought a directive compelling the State and other respondents to make a decision on the representation. The Court examined the relevant Government policy, …
The petitioners, a group of employees, filed writ petitions against the State of Maharashtra and the Municipal Corporation seeking payment of pending dues and statutory interest. The Municipal Corporation, as respondent No.3, argued that it would form a special team to verify each claim. The Court …
The applicants filed a civil application seeking condonation of delay in filing their petition before the High Court at Aurangabad. The court examined whether the delay could be condoned under the principles of civil procedure. It held that condonation is permissible provided the applicants comply …
The State of Maharashtra, through its AGP, filed a civil application seeking permission to withdraw statements recorded in earlier orders of Writ Petition No. 7098 of 2015. The applicant requested that the writ petition be treated as withdrawn, effectively disposing of the matter. The court, after …
The petitioners, who were office bearers of a cooperative society, were exonerated in an enquiry under Section 88 of the Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act, 1960, with liability placed on the ex‑chairman (respondent No.3). Respondent No.3 appealed the enquiry report under Section 152, and the …
The petitioners, Shahedav Uttam Khengare and others, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court seeking a decision on their representation dated 17 April 2026. The Court examined the petition and directed Respondent No.5 to decide the representation on its merits. The order required the …
Petitioner Sandeep Gangadhar BhalSing filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, seeking relief against the State of Maharashtra and other respondents. The petition raised the issue of the respondent's failure to decide the petitioner's representation dated 10 June 2026. …
The petitioners, Atmaram Pandurang Totewad and Rohidas Vishnudas Totewad (father and guardian), challenged a judgment dated 16 June 2025 of the Scrutiny Committee that invalidated their claim of belonging to the “Koli Mahadev” Scheduled Tribe. Their brother, Shravan Vishnudas Totewad, had earlier …
The appellant Nandabai filed a complaint alleging that her daughter Bhagyashree was harassed by her husband Parmeshwar and his family for additional dowry, culminating in them forcibly administering poison which caused Bhagyashree’s death. The trial court acquitted the accused of offences under …
Petitioner Pravin Kerbarao Bhise filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, challenging the inaction of the State of Maharashtra regarding his representation dated 08 June 2026. The petition sought a directive for the State to consider and decide on the representation. The …
The State of Maharashtra appealed the acquittal of Namdeo, who was charged under IPC Sections 307, 324 and 504 read with Section 34 for allegedly assaulting an informant and his mother during a dispute over mangoes. The prosecution relied on the dying declaration of the injured informant and …
The petitioner, Gajanan Jaganrao Panchal, filed a civil application seeking relief in a writ petition against the State of Maharashtra. The High Court of Bombay, Aurangabad Bench, considered the application and, relying on the reasons set out in the petition, allowed it in accordance with prayer …
The University was directed by an ad‑interim order to hold interviews for two professor posts but was restrained from declaring results or finalising appointments. The original respondent (the University) applied to modify that order, arguing that the selection process was stalled and that the …
Mateen Majeed Shaikh filed a civil application before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, seeking amendment of the pleadings to add new respondents. The State of Maharashtra and other respondents opposed the amendment. The Court examined whether the amendment was permissible under the …
The petitioners, Hanif Khan and Syed Sarwar, filed a civil application and writ petition against the State of Maharashtra and others, seeking to amend the pleadings to add additional respondents. The court examined whether such an amendment was permissible under procedural law. Relying on the …
Three writ petitions were filed by private schools alleging that, despite admitting students under the Right of Children to Free and Compulsory Education Act, 2009, the State of Maharashtra had not reimbursed the statutory fees. The High Court noted the uniform grievance and the need for prompt …
The petitioner, Duryodhan Arun Rathod, filed a writ petition seeking the inclusion of his name in the Shalarth ID. Respondent No.3 had already recommended his inclusion by a communication dated 18‑12‑2025. The petition raised the question of whether the authorities were bound to act on that …
The petitioner, Bhaskar Mahadev Ware, filed a civil application and a writ petition before the Aurangabad Bench of the High Court of Bombay seeking relief against the State of Maharashtra. The petition raised objections concerning the representation dated 14 February 2022 and alleged procedural …
Madhukar Ramrao Patil filed a writ petition challenging the order dated 31 January 2014 of the Deputy Charity Commissioner, Latur, which rejected his request for an adjournment in Change Report Enquiry Proceedings No. 451 of 2011. The petitioner argued that the order was arbitrary and sought relief. …
Rohidas Rama Sarode filed a civil application (Civil Application No. 7557 of 2026) and a writ petition (WP/154/2026) against the State of Maharashtra and its officials. The respondents, represented by Ms. Neha B. Kamble, raised no objection to the relief sought. The High Court of Bombay, Aurangabad …
The petitioner, Chandrakala Baburao Mekale, filed a writ petition under Article 226 challenging the Scrutiny Committee's order dated 30.07.2021 that rejected her claim of belonging to the 'Koli Mahadev' Scheduled Tribe. She argued that her father Devanand Mekale's genealogy and the conditional …
The petitioner, Ram Govind Bahudeshiya Sanstha, filed a writ petition alleging that the State of Maharashtra had not decided a proposal submitted by the petitioner on 15 October 2024. The petition sought a judicial direction compelling the respondent authority to act on the proposal. The High Court …
Ram Govind Bahudeshiya Sanstha, through its Secretary Seema S. Rajput, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, seeking a direction to the State of Maharashtra to decide a proposal submitted by the petitioner on 15 October 2024. The petition was heard by Justices Nitin …
The petitioners, represented by Mr. Shaikh Ashraf Patel and Mr. Abhijeet P. Avhad, filed a contempt petition (992 Cont. Petition No. 410 of 2014) before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench. The counsel submitted that the purpose of the petition had been fully subserved and that there was nothing …
Petitioner Jaidrath Mahadeo Gaikwad filed a contempt petition (Contempt Petition No. 373 of 2014) against V. Giriraj, Secretary, Rural Development and Water Conservation Department, Mumbai and others. The petition sought relief on the ground of alleged contempt of court. The learned counsel …
Maya Ramesh Bhaghat and others filed a civil application seeking relief from a delay in their writ petition before the High Court of Bombay, Aurangabad Bench. The respondents, the State of Maharashtra, opposed the application. The Court examined whether the delay could be condoned and what …
The petitioner, Jayant Raju Ambhore, sought appointment on compassionate ground after his father, a police constable, died in service; his application was rejected because his step‑mother (Respondent No.3) had a pending application for the same. The petitioner challenged the Maharashtra …
The appellant‑informant, Sheetal Patil, challenged the acquittal of her husband and in‑laws in a 2018 Sessions case involving alleged domestic violence, arson and attempted murder. She alleged that the accused demanded Rs.5,00,000, abused her, and on 2 May 2016 poured petrol on her and incited her …
The High Court of Bombay, Aurangabad Bench, heard three writ petitions filed by private schools alleging that, despite admitting students under the Right of Children to Free and Compulsory Education Act, 2009, they had not received the statutory fee reimbursements. The petitioners contended that the …
The petitioners, Maulana Mohammad Ali Johar Education Society, sought to recruit a Headmaster and Assistant Teachers for their schools, but a communication dated 22‑07‑2024 barred recruitment pending a management dispute before the Charity Commissioner. The petitioners argued that the pending …
The petitioners challenged recoveries of excess salary amounts made by the Zilla Parishad, arguing they were never shown cause nor required to execute any undertaking. Although the petitioners had executed undertakings in 1999 to refund any excess payments, the recoveries were effected more than …
The petitioner, Pandharinath Gorakh Chaudhary, filed a writ petition seeking the release of payment for his earned leave encashment from the Education Officer (Secondary) of Zilla Parishad Dhule and related authorities. The Court examined whether the petitioner was entitled to such encashment under …
The applicant, Ganesh Baburao Kshirsagar, filed a civil application seeking to amend Writ Petition No. 3450 of 2024 by adding Sainath Pandurang Gomare as respondent No. 3. The court examined whether such an amendment was permissible under the prayer clause ‘B’ of the original petition. Relying on …
Union Bank of India filed writ petition No. 2621 of 2021 before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, against the State of Maharashtra and other respondents. The petition sought relief, but the court noted that the office objections and the address of respondent No. 3 had not been furnished. The …
Kantabai Chandrakant Jadhao and another filed a civil application seeking relief against the State of Maharashtra. The applicants contended that the writ petition filed earlier should be reinstated. The court examined the reasons set out in the civil application and considered the pending office …
The petitioners, Dusane Education Society and others, filed Contempt Petition No. 600 of 2018 seeking time concerning an order under contempt related to a 2017 approval proposal. The petition was heard by a bench of Justice Sandipkumar C. More and Justice Abasaheb D. Shinde. Counsel for the …
The petitioners, Dhu... Tahna Bachav and another, filed a writ petition seeking relief after the civil suit R.C.S. No. 32 of 2016 pending before the Civil Judge Senior Division, Chalisgaon was dismissed on 11 March 2022 for non‑prosecution. They contended that, with the dismissal of the suit, there …
Shaikh Iqbal Dagdumiya filed a civil application before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, seeking condonation of delay. The Court examined whether the procedural delay could be condoned under the applicable law. It held that the delay may be condoned provided the petitioner pays a fee of …
Three writ petitions were filed by private schools alleging that, despite admitting students under the Right of Children to Free and Compulsory Education Act, 2009, the State of Maharashtra had not reimbursed the statutory fees. The High Court noted that similar facts existed across the petitions …
Petitioner Kismat Kamruddin Shaikh claimed that 16 Are of his 77 Are land, acquired for National Highway No. 752, were not accounted for in the acquisition records, which showed only 61 Are. He issued a notice and filed an application for measurement, but the Public Works Department did not respond. …
The petition filed by Young Boys Educational and Industrial Circle through its President was not presented before the court, leading to a dismissal for want of prosecution. The accompanying civil application was also dismissed. No substantive hearing on the merits took place. The court noted that …
The petitioner, Pralhad Nagorao Lolamwad, challenged a judgment of the Scrutiny Committee that denied his claim to belong to the Mannervarlu Scheduled Tribe. He argued that the same order had been successfully contested by other claimants in Writ Petition No. 10052 of 2025, resulting in a …
Adesh Raju Bhosale filed Writ Petition No. 10300 of 2019 before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, challenging actions of the State of Maharashtra and others. The petition was initially not taken on board, but the Court later decided to take it on board. The Court observed that the petitioner …
Petitioner Jayram filed a writ petition seeking relief concerning the disability certification of his minor daughter. The High Court ordered the petitioner to appear before a Medical Officer for the examination of the child. The petitioner complied, and the child was examined as directed. The Court …
The High Court considered two criminal applications filed by the original accused in Special Case No. 113 of 2023, seeking suspension of their life and term sentences and bail pending appeal. The accused were convicted under Sections 376‑D, 376‑DA, 363, 366 of the IPC, Section 34, and Sections 4 and …
Juned Layaque Shaikh and others filed a writ petition against the State of Maharashtra seeking payment of the salary difference for the period 1‑10‑2020 to 30‑09‑2023, contending that the honorarium for "shikshan sevak" should not apply because their appointment was on a compassionate basis. The …
The petitioners, a group of individuals, filed multiple writ petitions challenging actions of the State of Maharashtra. The High Court noted that the petitions had been delayed and, after hearing counsel, condoned the delay and restored the petitions to their original positions. The court then …
The petitioners filed several civil applications against the State of Maharashtra seeking various reliefs. The court observed that the petitions had been delayed and considered condoning the delay. It ordered that the petitions be restored to their original positions and allowed the civil …
The petitioners, Dadaji Harchand Patil and others, filed a contempt petition (Contempt Petition No. 403 of 2014) against the State of Maharashtra. The petition alleged that an order under contempt had not been complied with. The petitioner's counsel, on instruction, submitted that the contempt order …
The petitioners, a group of appointed individuals, filed multiple civil applications and writ petitions against the State of Maharashtra seeking relief. The court considered the delay in filing and, after hearing, condoned the delay, restoring the petitions to their original positions and allowing …
The petitioners, who are appointed officials, filed several civil applications and writ petitions against the State of Maharashtra. The High Court, after hearing the matter, condoned the delay in filing and restored the petitions to their original positions, thereby allowing the civil applications. …
Two NGOs, Vriddheswar Gramin Vikas Pratishthan and Shri Swami Prasad Pratishthan, filed a writ petition seeking reimbursement of fees paid for students admitted under the Right to Education Act. The Court noted that the matter was already addressed in its earlier decision in Writ Petition No.6307 of …
The petitioners filed a writ petition (No. 9736 of 2015) challenging an interlocutory order and a subsequent order arising from R.C.S. No.01 of 2014. The petitioners argued that the orders were still open for review. The court observed that R.C.S. No.01 of 2014, which contains the orders in …
The petitioners filed a contempt petition alleging that the respondents had not fixed their revised pay as ordered. Respondent No.3 produced a communication dated 13.01.2026 stating that the revised pay, including advance increment, would be fixed under the 6th and 7th Pay Commissions and that the …
The petitioners, a newly elected managing committee of Maulana Mohammad Ali Johar Education Society, sought to quash a communication dated 22‑07‑2024 that barred them from recruiting headmasters and assistant teachers. They argued that a pending change‑report before the Charity Commissioner should …
The petitioners, a newly elected managing committee of an educational society, challenged a communication dated 22‑07‑2024 that barred them from recruiting headmasters and assistant teachers, arguing that a pending change‑report before the Charity Commissioner should not impede recruitment. The …
Mahalaxmi Nagari Sahakari Pat Sanstha Ltd Jalna filed a civil application (No. 10289 of 2025) against the State of Maharashtra. The High Court of Bombay, Aurangabad Bench, heard the matter on 25 June 2026. The court allowed the application in accordance with prayer clause (B) and consequently …
