Created by Fuzzy Cloud

ABASAHEB D SHINDE

273 judgments · newest first · showing 201–273

KALPANA SUPADU GAIKWAD AND OTHERSversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS

DISPOSED OFF

The petitioners, who are primary and secondary education officers employed by the Zilla Parishad, filed writ petitions alleging denial of salary benefits under the one‑step pay scale applicable to employees working in Tribal and PESA areas. They sought verification of their service records and …

DNYANOBA BAPURAO JAGTAP AND OTHERSversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS

DISPOSED OFF

The petitioners filed a contempt petition alleging that the State of Maharashtra had failed to pay rental compensation ordered on 03/11/2015. The respondents, through their Advocate General, submitted that the compensation order had already been issued and that directions for payment had been given …

VALMIK JAIRAM KAJALE AND OTHERSversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS

DISPOSED OFF

The petitioners filed Writ Petition No. 11465 of 2021 before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, seeking relief against the State of Maharashtra. After the petition was filed, the petitioners, through their counsel, requested permission to withdraw the petition, stating that the purpose of …

RAVINDRA UKHDU SALVEversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER

DISPOSED OFF

The petitioner, Ravindra Ukhdu Salve, filed a contempt petition (Cont. Petition No. 512 of 2014) before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench. The petitioner’s counsel submitted that the order of contempt had been fully complied with. The court examined the submission and found that there was no …

JAYESH DAYARAM GANGAWANEversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

DISPOSED OFF

The appellant, Jayesh Dayaram Gangawane, was convicted of murder and sentenced to life imprisonment for stabbing his sister's husband, Arbaj, on 3 February 2023. He filed an application seeking suspension of the sentence and bail pending his appeal, alleging that the trial court erred in relying on …

ANIL BHAGWAN SHIRSATHversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHERS

DISPOSED OFF

The petitioner, Anil Bhagwan Shirsath, filed a continuation petition (No. 147 of 2016) seeking relief against the State of Maharashtra and others. The petition concerned a proposal dated 17 June 2013 that the court had earlier directed to be decided. On 3 June 2016 the court issued an order deciding …

VAIJINATH DATTARAM BYAGALWARversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS

DISPOSED OFF

Petitioner Vaijinath Dattaram Byagalwar claimed membership in the Mannervarlu Scheduled Tribe. The Scrutiny Committee invalidated his claim on 10 July 2018 after a Vigilance Cell report was submitted on 3 July 2018, but the petitioner was not provided a copy of the report nor an opportunity to file …

RAHUL CHANDRAHAS KHATIK AND OTHERSversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS

DISPOSED OFF

The petitioners filed a criminal writ petition challenging the investigation of a crime. The Superintendent of Police issued an order on 22 April 2026 transferring the investigation to the E.W.O. Wing, Ahilyanagar. The court observed that this transfer fulfilled the petitioners' purpose for filing …

HIMMAT NAMDEO PATILversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS

DISMISSED

The appellant, Himmat Patil, appealed against the acquittal of twelve accused in a 2016 Sessions case involving offences under Sections 143, 147, 148, 307, 324, 325 and 149 IPC. The prosecution alleged that the accused assaulted the victims with sticks, an iron rod, an axe and a sword on 14 February …

PRAVIN VASANTRAO PAWARversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS

DISPOSED OFF

The petitioner, Pravin Vasantrao Pawar, filed a criminal writ petition (No. 1528 of 2019) before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, challenging actions of the State of Maharashtra. The court, after reviewing the report of its Resource Personnel, noted that a charge-sheet in the underlying …

SANDIP SHRIKANT AHIREversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS

DISPOSED OFF

The petitioner, Sandip Shrikant Ahire, challenged a 24 May 2017 order of the Scrutiny Committee that invalidated his claim to belong to the ‘Thakur’ Scheduled Tribe, relying solely on the affinity test and area restriction. He submitted pre‑independence documents (1938, 1919, 1925, 1934) showing his …

SEEMA RAJU POLversusBHARAT PETROLEUM CORPORATION LTD. AND OTHERS

DISPOSED OFF

The petitioner, Seema Raju Pol, filed a contempt petition alleging that Bharat Petroleum Corporation Ltd. and others failed to comply with a court order dated 09/03/2016 directing the reassessment of her marks. The High Court examined whether the respondents had complied with the contempt order. It …

SHEETAL BHAGWAN CHAUDHARIversusDEGAMBAR VITHU NARKHEDE AND OTHERS

DISPOSED OFF

The petitioner, Sheetal Bhagwan Chaudhari, filed a petition before the High Court of Judicature at Bombay, Aurangabad Bench. The petition was being heard when a subsequent event occurred that rendered the relief sought no longer applicable. On instructions, the petitioner's counsel informed the …

ANIL CHANDULAL VARMAversusDATTU RAMRAO SHINDE AND OTHERS

DISPOSED OFF

The petitioner, Anil Chandulal Varma, filed a writ petition (No. 10934 of 2014) in the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, against Dattu Ramrao Shinde and others. The petitioner’s counsel submitted that the dispute underlying the writ petition and the related R.C.S. No. 771 of 2012 had been settled …

AU Small Finance Bank LtdversusThe State of Maharashtra

DISPOSED OFF

The petitioner, AU Small Finance Bank Ltd, filed a contempt petition alleging that the State of Maharashtra authorities had failed to hand over possession of a property despite a prior court order dated 16/09/2025. The court noted that the respondent's Advocate General indicated that possession …

Shantaram Tryabak AparversusRAJESH KUMAR I A S Secretary

DISPOSED OFF

The petitioner, Shantaram Tryabak Apar, filed a continuous petition (No. 893 of 2025) seeking relief from the High Court of Bombay, Aurangabad Bench. The court had previously directed that a certain amount be paid to the petitioner. The petitioner, through counsel Mr. Badribishan A. Darak, informed …

VINOD SUBHASH KOTEversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

DISPOSED OFF

The petitioner, original complainant in a criminal case (R.C.C. No.3 of 2018), filed a writ petition seeking an expeditious disposal of the pending trial within one year. The petition highlighted that the case, over five years old, had seen repeated absences of the accused and numerous hearings on a …

ANGAD DAGDU GHOLAPversusVINAYAK RAMBHAU MOLWANE AND OTHERS

DISPOSED OFF

The petitioner, Angad Dagdu Gholap, filed a writ petition challenging the order dated 17 November 2014 of the Joint Civil Judge Junior Division, Washi, which rejected his amendment application in R.C.S. No. 264 of 2013. The High Court examined the impugned order and the arguments of counsel. The …

SHIVSHANKAR HARIBHAU INGALEversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

DISPOSED OFF

Shivshankar Haribhau Ingale, originally accused No.2 in a murder case, filed an application seeking suspension of his life imprisonment sentence and release on bail pending appeal. The prosecution alleged that Ingale, along with two others, murdered Krushna, relying primarily on a confessional …

SAMBHAJI VAIJINATH BEDADEversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS

DISPOSED OFF

Petitioner Sambhaji Vaijinath Bedade filed a contempt petition against the State of Maharashtra and other respondents alleging non-payment of salary arrears. Respondent No.4, the District Social Welfare Officer, submitted a letter confirming that Respondent No.6 had forwarded the petitioner's …

SHAHISTA MOIN SHEIKHversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS

Withdrawn

The petitioner, Shahista Moin Sheikh, filed a criminal writ petition challenging a ‘B’ summary report filed by the Investigating Officer. During the hearing, the petitioner’s counsel sought to withdraw the petition, requesting liberty to file a protest petition against the summary report. The Court …

DEVIDAS NANDU RATHODversusBHAU DAGDU RATHOD

DISPOSED OFF

The petitioner, Devidas Nandu Rathod, filed a writ petition against Bhau Dagdu Rathod. The court observed that both the petitioner and Respondent No.1 had died, and directed the petitioner to record their legal heirs within four weeks. The petitioner was given a deadline of 04.10.2025 to comply. The …

MANOHAR INDRABHAN SARODE AND OTHERSversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS

DISPOSED OFF

The petitioners, Manohar Indrabhans Sarode and others, filed two continuation petitions challenging a contempt order. The respondents, the State of Maharashtra and others, were represented by Ms. M.N. Ghanekar. The petitioners complied with the contempt order, as acknowledged by their counsel. On …

SALMAN USMAN SAYYEDversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Withdrawn

The petitioners, Shyam Murlidhar Salunke, filed bail applications (Nos. 2350 and 2351 of 2025) before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench. During the pendency of these applications, the charge sheet was filed against the accused. Counsel for the petitioners sought leave to withdraw the pending …

SHYAM MURLIDHAR SALUNKEversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Withdrawn

The petitioners, Shyam Murlidhar Salunke, filed two bail applications (Nos. 2351 and 2350 of 2025) before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench. During the pendency of these applications, the charge sheet was filed against the accused. Counsel for the applicants sought leave of the court to …

SAMEER ALI GULAM ALI MAKRANIversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER

DISPOSED OFF

The petitioner, Sameer Ali Gulam Ali Makrani, filed a criminal writ petition before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, seeking relief against the State of Maharashtra. During the proceedings, the petitioner, through counsel Adv. Rupesh A. Jaiswal, requested the withdrawal of the petition. The …

SANJAY NARSINGRAO WADIKARversusSHRI RANJIT SINGH DEOL

DISPOSED OFF

The petitioner, Sanjay Narsingrao Wadikar, filed a contempt petition before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench. The petitioner’s counsel, Mr. Tukaram Maruti Venjane, informed the court that the order of contempt had been complied with. The court noted that with compliance, there was no …

ASHOK MANIKRAO KHAMKAR AND ANOTHERversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS

DISPOSED OFF

Ashok Manikrao Khamkar and another filed a petition before the Bombay High Court seeking relief regarding their seniority. The respondents, the State of Maharashtra and others, were represented by Ms. M.N. Ghanekar. The Advocate General submitted that the seniority issue had already been decided on …

CHANDRAKANT SUKHADEV BHOTKARversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS

DISPOSED OFF

The petitioner, Chandrakant Sukhadey Bhotkar, claimed membership in the ‘Koli Malhar’ Scheduled Tribe, a claim pending before the Scrutiny Committee since May 2013. During this pendency, his employer issued a show‑cause notice demanding a tribe validity certificate, threatening termination of his …

VINAYAK SHRIPATI KARADversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS

DISMISSED

The petitioner, who was the original informant in a 2021 sessions case arising from a land dispute, sought the appointment of a Special Public Prosecutor, alleging that the regular prosecutor was not prosecuting diligently and that the accused were influential. The respondent, a law department …

SWAPNALI BALASAHEB DABHADEversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS

DISPOSED OFF

Swapnali Balasaheb Dabhade, a government employee, filed a writ petition seeking a direction that her pending claim of belonging to the Buddha caste be verified by the Scrutiny Committee. She feared that a delay in the verification could lead to termination of her service. The Court considered the …

JAGANNATH BHANUDAS MULEversusTHE COLLECTOR AURANGABAD AND OTHERS

DISPOSED OFF

Petitioner Jagannath Bhanudas Mule filed a writ petition challenging a compensation order. The Respondent No.2 submitted a decision dated 18.06.2026 along with a cheque for Rs.3,36,08,065 and stated it would refer the dispute to the Railway Court and deposit the amount within four weeks. The learned …

KOKILABAI BABURAO CHOUDHARIversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS

DISPOSED OFF

The petitioner, Kokilabai Baburao Choudhari, filed a criminal application seeking the withdrawal of Rs.7,00,000 deposited by Laxmi Gramin Bigar Sheti Sahakari Patsanstha Maryadit. The application referenced an order dated 05.03.2025 that permitted such withdrawal. The court examined the petition and …

BABAN DUL BAJI SURYWANSHIversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS

DISPOSED OFF

The appellant, Baban Dul Baji Surywanshi, filed a criminal appeal (No. 165/2026) against his acquittal in a case tried by the State of Maharashtra. The appellant sought condonation of delay, alleging that the appeal was filed within the prescribed period. The learned counsel for the appellant …

PRATHMESH PRASHANTKUMAR PAWARversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER

DISPOSED OFF

The petitioner, Prathmesh Prashantkumar Pawar, a student, filed a writ petition seeking a direction for the prompt determination of his claim that he belongs to the 'Tokre Koli' Scheduled Tribe. He argued that a swift decision is essential for his higher education plans. The Court, after hearing …

AAMINBHAI BUDHANBHAI SHAIKHversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS

DISPOSED OFF

The petitioner, Aaminbhai Budhanbhai Shaikh, filed a criminal writ petition seeking relief. The Court directed the petitioner to deposit a certain amount. The petitioner, through counsel, informed the Court that he is unable to make the deposit. No further arguments or evidence were presented. …

SANDHYA ADINARAYAN CHENNAGONIversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Withdrawn

The applicant, Sandhya Adinarayan Chennagoni, filed a bail application in the High Court of Bombay, Aurangabad Bench. While the bail application was pending, the charge-sheet was filed against her. She sought leave to withdraw the bail application so that she could file a fresh bail application …

RENUKA SATHYAM YENGALIversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Withdrawn

Renuka Sathyam Yengali filed a bail application in the High Court of Bombay, Aurangabad Bench. During the pendency of the application, the charge-sheet was filed, prompting the applicant to seek permission to withdraw the bail application and re‑file it before the Sessions Court. The learned counsel …

KANAKTARA NARSIMHA VENGULI AND ANOTHERversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Withdrawn

The applicants filed a bail application in the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench. While the application was pending, the charge-sheet was filed, prompting the applicants to seek permission to withdraw the bail application and re‑file it before the Sessions Court. The learned counsel argued that …

JAGDISH KAPUR PATELversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Withdrawn

The applicant, Jagdish Kapur Patel, filed a bail application in the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench. While the application was pending, the charge-sheet was filed, prompting the applicant to seek permission to withdraw the bail application and instead file a fresh bail application before the …

AMOL RAMLAL BAGULversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS

DISPOSED OFF

Amol Ramlal Bagul filed a writ petition challenging the Scrutiny Committee's order dated 12.12.2025 that dismissed his claim of belonging to the ‘Thakur’ Scheduled Tribe on the ground of non‑prosecution. The petitioner alleged that he never received the show‑cause notices issued by the Committee and …