DISPOSED OFF
The petitioners, employees of the Zilla Parishad, filed writ petitions alleging denial of salary benefits under the one‑step pay scale applicable to staff serving in Tribal and PESA areas, as per a Government Resolution dated 29‑02‑2024. The State of Maharashtra contended that the petitioners’ …
DISPOSED OFF
The petitioners, employees of the Zilla Parishad, challenged the denial of salary benefits under the one‑step pay scale applicable to staff serving in Tribal and PESA areas. They sought a directive that the Education Officer scrutinise their service records and, where no legal impediment exists, …
DISPOSED OFF
The petitioners, who are primary and secondary education officers employed by the Zilla Parishad, filed writ petitions alleging denial of salary benefits under the one‑step pay scale applicable to employees working in Tribal and PESA areas. They sought verification of their service records and …
DISPOSED OFF
The petitioners filed a contempt petition alleging that the State of Maharashtra had failed to pay rental compensation ordered on 03/11/2015. The respondents, through their Advocate General, submitted that the compensation order had already been issued and that directions for payment had been given …
DISPOSED OFF
The petitioners filed Writ Petition No. 11465 of 2021 before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, seeking relief against the State of Maharashtra. After the petition was filed, the petitioners, through their counsel, requested permission to withdraw the petition, stating that the purpose of …
DISPOSED OFF
The petitioner, Ravindra Ukhdu Salve, filed a contempt petition (Cont. Petition No. 512 of 2014) before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench. The petitioner’s counsel submitted that the order of contempt had been fully complied with. The court examined the submission and found that there was no …
DISPOSED OFF
Swapnil ChandraKant Karankale filed a contempt petition (No. 738 of 2025) before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, against the State of Maharashtra and others. The petitioner alleged that a prior contempt order had not been complied with. The petitioner’s counsel submitted an affidavit …
DISPOSED OFF
Mahadev Eknath Mane and others filed a civil application before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, seeking relief against the State of Maharashtra. The applicants requested condonation of delay in filing the application. The respondents, represented by the Attorney General of the State, …
DISPOSED OFF
The petitioner, Suvarna Kashinath Kale, filed a writ petition challenging a decision affecting his position as Sarpanch. During the hearing, counsel for the petitioner argued that the petition should proceed despite the expiration of his term. The respondent, the State of Maharashtra, contended that …
DISPOSED OFF
The appellant, Jayesh Dayaram Gangawane, was convicted of murder and sentenced to life imprisonment for stabbing his sister's husband, Arbaj, on 3 February 2023. He filed an application seeking suspension of the sentence and bail pending his appeal, alleging that the trial court erred in relying on …
DISPOSED OFF
The petitioner, Anil Bhagwan Shirsath, filed a continuation petition (No. 147 of 2016) seeking relief against the State of Maharashtra and others. The petition concerned a proposal dated 17 June 2013 that the court had earlier directed to be decided. On 3 June 2016 the court issued an order deciding …
DISPOSED OFF
Petitioner Vaijinath Dattaram Byagalwar claimed membership in the Mannervarlu Scheduled Tribe. The Scrutiny Committee invalidated his claim on 10 July 2018 after a Vigilance Cell report was submitted on 3 July 2018, but the petitioner was not provided a copy of the report nor an opportunity to file …
Dismissed/Rule Discharged
The petitioners filed several civil applications challenging actions of the State of Maharashtra. The High Court noted that the filings were delayed and, after hearing, condoned the delay, restored the petitions to their original positions and allowed the civil applications. The petitioners then …
DISPOSED OFF
The petitioners filed a criminal writ petition challenging the investigation of a crime. The Superintendent of Police issued an order on 22 April 2026 transferring the investigation to the E.W.O. Wing, Ahilyanagar. The court observed that this transfer fulfilled the petitioners' purpose for filing …
DISPOSED OFF
The petitioner, Rutik Panjabi, challenged a detention order dated 24‑06‑2025 issued by the District Magistrate under Section 3(2) of the Maharashtra Prevention of Dangerous Activities Act (MPDA Act). Although the petitioner faced multiple pending criminal cases and had been released on bail for one …
DISMISSED
The appellant, Himmat Patil, appealed against the acquittal of twelve accused in a 2016 Sessions case involving offences under Sections 143, 147, 148, 307, 324, 325 and 149 IPC. The prosecution alleged that the accused assaulted the victims with sticks, an iron rod, an axe and a sword on 14 February …
DISPOSED OFF
The petitioner, a civil surgeon, was transferred from Beed to Ahilyanagar and then, within a short period, to Udgir, which he claimed was a mid‑term transfer violating the Maharashtra Government Servants Regulation of Transfers Act. He filed an original application before the Maharashtra …
DISPOSED OFF
The petitioner, Pravin Vasantrao Pawar, filed a criminal writ petition (No. 1528 of 2019) before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, challenging actions of the State of Maharashtra. The court, after reviewing the report of its Resource Personnel, noted that a charge-sheet in the underlying …
DISPOSED OFF
The petitioner, Matoshree Shikshan Prasarak Mandal Ashok R. Kachole, filed a contempt petition alleging non‑compliance with a court direction to start Class‑VIII for the academic year 2025‑2026. Respondents, including the State and several officials, submitted a letter dated 26‑11‑2025 confirming …
DISPOSED OFF
The petitioner, Sandip Shrikant Ahire, challenged a 24 May 2017 order of the Scrutiny Committee that invalidated his claim to belong to the ‘Thakur’ Scheduled Tribe, relying solely on the affinity test and area restriction. He submitted pre‑independence documents (1938, 1919, 1925, 1934) showing his …
DISPOSED OFF
The petitioner, Seema Raju Pol, filed a contempt petition alleging that Bharat Petroleum Corporation Ltd. and others failed to comply with a court order dated 09/03/2016 directing the reassessment of her marks. The High Court examined whether the respondents had complied with the contempt order. It …
DISPOSED OFF
The petitioner, Sheetal Bhagwan Chaudhari, filed a petition before the High Court of Judicature at Bombay, Aurangabad Bench. The petition was being heard when a subsequent event occurred that rendered the relief sought no longer applicable. On instructions, the petitioner's counsel informed the …
DISPOSED OFF
The petitioner, Anil Chandulal Varma, filed a writ petition (No. 10934 of 2014) in the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, against Dattu Ramrao Shinde and others. The petitioner’s counsel submitted that the dispute underlying the writ petition and the related R.C.S. No. 771 of 2012 had been settled …
DISPOSED OFF
Vinod Anna Jadhav filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, challenging the failure of the Education Officer (Secondary), Zilla Parishad, Beed, to decide on a proposal he submitted on 06‑02‑2015. The petitioner alleged that the inaction violated his right to a timely …
DISPOSED OFF
The petitioner, Ajay Govindrao Surywanshi, filed a civil application (No.336 of 2024) and a writ petition (No.12304/2022) seeking relief against the State of Maharashtra. The civil application was allowed in accordance with prayer clauses B and C, though the judgment does not detail the specific …
DISPOSED OFF
The petitioner challenged his preventive detention order dated 28‑08‑2025, issued under the Maharashtra Prevention of Dangerous Activities Act, 1981, on the ground that the detaining authority had not established a live link between the alleged offences and a threat to public order, nor recorded …
DISPOSED OFF
The petitioner, Ramamata Shikshan Prasarak Mandal, sought a court direction compelling the State of Maharashtra to permit the commencement of 8th standard classes for the academic year 2019‑2020, after its proposal was rejected by an unreasoned order dated 02‑05‑2018. The Court examined whether the …
DISPOSED OFF
The appellants filed a criminal appeal under Section 11 of the Maharashtra Protection of Interest of Depositors (In Finance Establishments) Act, 1999, originally in 2018. When the matter was called, the original counsel, Mr. Rahul G. Joshi, withdrew his instructions, and a replacement counsel, Mr. …
DISPOSED OFF
The petitioner, AU Small Finance Bank Ltd, filed a contempt petition alleging that the State of Maharashtra authorities had failed to hand over possession of a property despite a prior court order dated 16/09/2025. The court noted that the respondent's Advocate General indicated that possession …
DISPOSED OFF
Baban Murlidhar Patunkar filed a writ petition challenging an order dated page 150. The petitioner claimed a grievance concerning a writ property. While the petition was pending, a related civil suit was decided in the petitioner's favour, thereby redressing his grievance. The Court held that the …
DISPOSED OFF
The petitioners sought approval of their services, which was rejected by the State of Maharashtra on 16 May 2023 on the ground of a management dispute and pending submission of Schedule‑I. The petitioners later produced an order dated 27 May 2025 from the Assistant Charity Commissioner, Beed, …
DISPOSED OFF
The petitioner, Shantaram Tryabak Apar, filed a continuous petition (No. 893 of 2025) seeking relief from the High Court of Bombay, Aurangabad Bench. The court had previously directed that a certain amount be paid to the petitioner. The petitioner, through counsel Mr. Badribishan A. Darak, informed …
DISPOSED OFF
The petitioner, EKLAVYA JAL KSHETRIYA BHOI MATSYA VYAVSAIK CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETY, challenged an order that allotted a fish tank to the respondents for a period of five years, which expired in 2015. The petition, filed in 2014, sought relief despite the expiry of the allotment period. The Court …
DISPOSED OFF
The petitioner, Sayyad Sattar Sayyad Abbas (deceased) through his legal representatives, filed a civil application seeking relief under prayer clause B against the State of Maharashtra. The application alleged certain grounds (not detailed in the judgment) and requested the Court to permit a …
DISPOSED OFF
The petitioners, Trimbak Mahadev Markad and others, filed a writ petition challenging an order dated 10 June 2022 issued by the State of Maharashtra. The challenge was premised on Clause‑3 of a Government Resolution dated 13 October 2016, which the petitioners alleged to be discriminatory and …
DISPOSED OFF
The petitioners, Miss Shaista Anjum Syed Asger and others, filed writ petitions challenging the non-approval of their appointments as primary teachers. The Education Officer subsequently approved their appointments on 9 April 2026, rendering the petitions moot. The petitioners' counsel submitted a …
DISPOSED OFF
The petitioner, a landowner whose claim for compensation under the National Highways Act was pending as of 28 March 2008, sought solatium and interest on the compensation awarded for land acquired by the National Highway Authority of India. The Court examined the directions issued in the Supreme …
DISPOSED OFF
The petitioner, Rajesh Chandramal Galani, filed a writ petition seeking solatium and interest on compensation for land acquired by the National Highway Authority of India (NHAI). The High Court examined the Supreme Court’s decision in Union of India v. Tarsem Singh, which laid down criteria for …
DISPOSED OFF
The petitioners, landowners whose lands were acquired under the National Highways Act, sought solatium, interest and interest on solatium on their compensation. The High Court examined the directions issued by the Supreme Court in National Highways Authority of India v. Tarsem Singh (Review Petition …
DISPOSED OFF
Petitioner Kailas Murlidhar Agrawal filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court seeking solatium and interest on compensation awarded for land acquired under the National Highways Act. The Court referred to a recent Supreme Court review order in NHAI v. Tarsem Singh, which laid down …
DISPOSED OFF
The petitioner, Almas Vahatuk Va Hamal Sahakari Sanstha, a cooperative labour society that has handled food‑grain work in Parbhani district since 2005, sought a writ to quash communications authorising work to another cooperative (Respondent No.5) and to direct the authorities to award work to it …
DISPOSED OFF
The petitioner, original complainant in a criminal case (R.C.C. No.3 of 2018), filed a writ petition seeking an expeditious disposal of the pending trial within one year. The petition highlighted that the case, over five years old, had seen repeated absences of the accused and numerous hearings on a …
DISPOSED OFF
The petitioner, Angad Dagdu Gholap, filed a writ petition challenging the order dated 17 November 2014 of the Joint Civil Judge Junior Division, Washi, which rejected his amendment application in R.C.S. No. 264 of 2013. The High Court examined the impugned order and the arguments of counsel. The …
DISPOSED OFF
The petitioners, Zakir Ali and others, filed a civil application before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, seeking relief against the State of Maharashtra. The application primarily sought condonation of delay in filing the petition. The respondents, represented by the Attorney General of …
DISPOSED OFF
Shivshankar Haribhau Ingale, originally accused No.2 in a murder case, filed an application seeking suspension of his life imprisonment sentence and release on bail pending appeal. The prosecution alleged that Ingale, along with two others, murdered Krushna, relying primarily on a confessional …
DISPOSED OFF
The petitioner, Shubham Arvind Patil, filed a contempt petition (No. 872 of 2025) against the State of Maharashtra. The petitioner, through counsel, asserted that the order under contempt had been fully complied with and that no further relief was required. The respondent, represented by the …
DISPOSED OFF
Petitioner Sambhaji Vaijinath Bedade filed a contempt petition against the State of Maharashtra and other respondents alleging non-payment of salary arrears. Respondent No.4, the District Social Welfare Officer, submitted a letter confirming that Respondent No.6 had forwarded the petitioner's …
Withdrawn
The petitioner, Shahista Moin Sheikh, filed a criminal writ petition challenging a ‘B’ summary report filed by the Investigating Officer. During the hearing, the petitioner’s counsel sought to withdraw the petition, requesting liberty to file a protest petition against the summary report. The Court …
DISPOSED OFF
The petitioner, Shree Swami Services Labour and Security Contractor, was awarded a contract to collect garbage for the Jamner Municipal Council and performed the work in October‑November 2021, submitting bills for payment. Despite repeated requests, the respondent (Chief Officer of Jamner Municipal …
DISPOSED OFF
The petitioner, Devidas Nandu Rathod, filed a writ petition against Bhau Dagdu Rathod. The court observed that both the petitioner and Respondent No.1 had died, and directed the petitioner to record their legal heirs within four weeks. The petitioner was given a deadline of 04.10.2025 to comply. The …
DISPOSED OFF
The petitioners, Manohar Indrabhans Sarode and others, filed two continuation petitions challenging a contempt order. The respondents, the State of Maharashtra and others, were represented by Ms. M.N. Ghanekar. The petitioners complied with the contempt order, as acknowledged by their counsel. On …
DISPOSED OFF
The petitioner, Ramesh Onkar Thakur, challenged the order of the Scheduled Tribe Certificate Scrutiny Committee that invalidated his claim of belonging to the “Thakur” Scheduled Tribe. He submitted pre‑constitution documents dated 1926 and 1932, which the Committee discarded, insisting on an …
DISPOSED OFF
The petitioner, Almas Vahatuk Va Hamal Sahakari Sanstha, a cooperative labour society that has handled food grain work in Parbhani district since 2005, sought to quash communications and direct the allocation of work to it, alleging that the allocation to another cooperative, Shalimar Vahatuk Va …
Withdrawn
The petitioners, Shyam Murlidhar Salunke, filed bail applications (Nos. 2350 and 2351 of 2025) before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench. During the pendency of these applications, the charge sheet was filed against the accused. Counsel for the petitioners sought leave to withdraw the pending …
Withdrawn
The petitioners, Shyam Murlidhar Salunke, filed two bail applications (Nos. 2351 and 2350 of 2025) before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench. During the pendency of these applications, the charge sheet was filed against the accused. Counsel for the applicants sought leave of the court to …
DISPOSED OFF
The petitioner, Sameer Ali Gulam Ali Makrani, filed a criminal writ petition before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, seeking relief against the State of Maharashtra. During the proceedings, the petitioner, through counsel Adv. Rupesh A. Jaiswal, requested the withdrawal of the petition. The …
DISPOSED OFF
The petitioner, Sanjay Narsingrao Wadikar, filed a contempt petition before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench. The petitioner’s counsel, Mr. Tukaram Maruti Venjane, informed the court that the order of contempt had been complied with. The court noted that with compliance, there was no …
DISPOSED OFF
Ashok Manikrao Khamkar and another filed a petition before the Bombay High Court seeking relief regarding their seniority. The respondents, the State of Maharashtra and others, were represented by Ms. M.N. Ghanekar. The Advocate General submitted that the seniority issue had already been decided on …
DISPOSED OFF
The petitioner, Chandrakant Sukhadey Bhotkar, claimed membership in the ‘Koli Malhar’ Scheduled Tribe, a claim pending before the Scrutiny Committee since May 2013. During this pendency, his employer issued a show‑cause notice demanding a tribe validity certificate, threatening termination of his …
DISPOSED OFF
The petitioner, Pratapsinh Naraynsinh Thakur, was allotted a gharkul (a small dwelling) on a plot of land in Sonkhed, Nanded, and received compensation of Rs. 28,30,602 for the gharkul. He later claimed an additional compensation of Rs. 6,42,098, arguing that the compensation paid covered only the …
DISMISSED
The petitioner, who was the original informant in a 2021 sessions case arising from a land dispute, sought the appointment of a Special Public Prosecutor, alleging that the regular prosecutor was not prosecuting diligently and that the accused were influential. The respondent, a law department …
DISPOSED OFF
Swapnali Balasaheb Dabhade, a government employee, filed a writ petition seeking a direction that her pending claim of belonging to the Buddha caste be verified by the Scrutiny Committee. She feared that a delay in the verification could lead to termination of her service. The Court considered the …
DISPOSED OFF
Petitioner Jagannath Bhanudas Mule filed a writ petition challenging a compensation order. The Respondent No.2 submitted a decision dated 18.06.2026 along with a cheque for Rs.3,36,08,065 and stated it would refer the dispute to the Railway Court and deposit the amount within four weeks. The learned …
DISPOSED OFF
The petitioner, Kokilabai Baburao Choudhari, filed a criminal application seeking the withdrawal of Rs.7,00,000 deposited by Laxmi Gramin Bigar Sheti Sahakari Patsanstha Maryadit. The application referenced an order dated 05.03.2025 that permitted such withdrawal. The court examined the petition and …
DISPOSED OFF
The appellant, Baban Dul Baji Surywanshi, filed a criminal appeal (No. 165/2026) against his acquittal in a case tried by the State of Maharashtra. The appellant sought condonation of delay, alleging that the appeal was filed within the prescribed period. The learned counsel for the appellant …
DISPOSED OFF
The petitioner, Prathmesh Prashantkumar Pawar, a student, filed a writ petition seeking a direction for the prompt determination of his claim that he belongs to the 'Tokre Koli' Scheduled Tribe. He argued that a swift decision is essential for his higher education plans. The Court, after hearing …
DISPOSED OFF
The petitioner, Aaminbhai Budhanbhai Shaikh, filed a criminal writ petition seeking relief. The Court directed the petitioner to deposit a certain amount. The petitioner, through counsel, informed the Court that he is unable to make the deposit. No further arguments or evidence were presented. …
DISPOSED OFF
Sunil Laxmanrao Wakekar filed Contempt Petition No. 1093 of 2025 in the High Court of Bombay, Aurangabad Bench, against the State of Maharashtra. The petitioner sought relief alleging contempt of court. During proceedings, the petitioner submitted a communication dated 17-02-2026 expressing his …
Withdrawn
The applicant, Sandhya Adinarayan Chennagoni, filed a bail application in the High Court of Bombay, Aurangabad Bench. While the bail application was pending, the charge-sheet was filed against her. She sought leave to withdraw the bail application so that she could file a fresh bail application …
Withdrawn
Renuka Sathyam Yengali filed a bail application in the High Court of Bombay, Aurangabad Bench. During the pendency of the application, the charge-sheet was filed, prompting the applicant to seek permission to withdraw the bail application and re‑file it before the Sessions Court. The learned counsel …
Withdrawn
The applicants filed a bail application in the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench. While the application was pending, the charge-sheet was filed, prompting the applicants to seek permission to withdraw the bail application and re‑file it before the Sessions Court. The learned counsel argued that …
Withdrawn
The applicant, Jagdish Kapur Patel, filed a bail application in the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench. While the application was pending, the charge-sheet was filed, prompting the applicant to seek permission to withdraw the bail application and instead file a fresh bail application before the …
DISPOSED OFF
Amol Ramlal Bagul filed a writ petition challenging the Scrutiny Committee's order dated 12.12.2025 that dismissed his claim of belonging to the ‘Thakur’ Scheduled Tribe on the ground of non‑prosecution. The petitioner alleged that he never received the show‑cause notices issued by the Committee and …