Bombay High Court

VIKHROLI SHIVRAM INDUSTRIAL PREMISES CO OP SOCIETY LTD THROUGH FEDRIC VAZversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS

Decided: 13 January 2026
Disposal: Dissmiss For Default/Non-Prosecution
Bench: A S GADKARI SHYAM C CHANDAK

Holding

The petition is dismissed for non‑prosecution.

Summary

The petitioner, Vikhroli Shivram Industrial Premises Co‑op. Society Ltd., filed Criminal Writ Petition No. 3586 of 2013 in the High Court of Bombay. The record indicates that after 14 October 2014 the petitioner or its advocate did not take any steps to circulate the petition even once. The court inferred that the petitioner was not interested in pursuing the petition. Accordingly, the Court held that the petition could not be proceeded with for lack of prosecution. The petition was therefore dismissed for non‑prosecution.

Issues considered

Whether the criminal writ petition should be dismissed on the ground of non‑prosecution?

Subjects

non‑prosecution
petition dismissal
criminal writ petition
High Court of Bombay

Judgment

            P. H. Jayani                                                   18 WP3586.2013.doc


                           IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                                 CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

                             CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 3586 OF 2013

            Vikhroli Shivram Industrial Premises Co-op.
            Society Ltd., Mumbai                               …. Petitioner
                  v/s.
            The State of Maharashtra and Ors.                  …. Respondents
                               ________________________________
            None for the Petitioner.
            Mr. Vinod Chate, APP for the Respondent – State.
                                ________________________________

                                              CORAM: A.S. GADKARI AND
                                                     SHYAM C. CHANDAK, JJ.

                                              DATED : 13th JANUARY, 2026.
            P. C. :-

            1)             None for the Petitioner.

            2)             Record indicates that, after 14 th October 2014, the Petitioner

            and/or its Advocate has not taken any steps to circulate the Petition, even

            for once.

            2.1)           It appears that, the Petitioner is not interested in pursuing the

            Petition.

            3)             Dismissed for non-prosecution.



                   (SHYAM C. CHANDAK, J.)                       (A.S. GADKARI, J.)



PREETI
HEERO
JAYANI
Digitally signed
by PREETI
HEERO JAYANI
Date: 2026.01.17
17:48:19 +0530
                                                                                       1/1

Continue reading with your account

Checking your session…