Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

ASARAM KUDAJI FALKEversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS

Disposal
DISPOSED OFF

Holding

The Court allowed the withdrawal of the writ petitions and disposed of them, while extending the interim order for four weeks.

Summary

The petitioners, Asaram Kudadji Falke and Bramdeo Asaram Kale, filed writ petitions challenging actions of the State of Maharashtra and other respondents. The petitioners sought to withdraw the petitions, citing the existence of an alternate legal remedy. The Court, after hearing counsel, granted liberty to withdraw the petitions and ordered that the time spent on these petitions be taken into account by the concerned authority. The interim order dated 13.01.2014 was directed to remain in force for an additional four weeks from the date of this order. Consequently, the writ petitions were disposed of without a substantive decision on the merits.

Issues considered

  • Whether the petitioners may withdraw the writ petitions on the ground of an alternate remedy being available
  • Whether the interim order dated 13.01.2014 should continue pending the withdrawal

Subjects

  • writ petition
  • withdrawal
  • alternate remedy
  • interim order
  • High Court of Bombay
  • disposal

Judgment

2026:BHC-AUG:34193



                                                                  9 WP362.2014+
                                               -1-

                     IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                               BENCH AT AURANGABAD

                             9 WRIT PETITION NO. 362 OF 2014
                                  ASARAM KUDAJI FALKE
                                            VERSUS
                       THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS
                                               ...
              Advocate for the Petitioner : Mr. Nilkanth P. Bangar
              AGP for Respondent/State: Mr. B. V. Virdhe
              Advocate for Respondents No.3&4 : Mr. Anant Dale h/f. Mr. Vakil
              Laharimanohar D.
                                               …
                                             WITH
                                               …

                                  WRIT PETITION NO. 361 OF 2014
                                  BRAMHDEO ASARAM KALE
                                            VERSUS
                       THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS
                                               ...
              Advocate for the Petitioner : Mr. Nilkanth P. Bangar
              AGP for Respondent/State: Mr. B. V. Virdhe
              Advocate for Respondents No.3&4 : Mr. Anant Dale h/f. Mr. Vakil
              Laharimanohar D.
                                               …


                                           CORAM : SACHIN S. DESHMUKH, J.
                                              Date : 06.08.2026

              PER COURT :-

              1.          In view of availability of alternate remedy, learned

              counsel for the Petitioners, on instructions, seeks liberty to

              withdraw these Petitions to prosecute the remedy which is

              available in law.
                                                       9 WP362.2014+
                                 -2-

2.         With the aforesaid liberty, the Writ Petitions are

disposed of with further direction that the time spent in

prosecuting the present Petitions shall be considered by the

concerned authority. The interim order dated 13.01.2014, since

it was in force from said date, shall continue for the period of four

(04) weeks from today.




                                       (SACHIN S. DESHMUKH, J.)

marathe


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.