Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

RAMESH RANCHHODDAS JOSHIversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS

Decided
Disposal
Dissmiss For Default/Non-Prosecution

Holding

The petition is dismissed for non‑prosecution.

Summary

The petitioner, Ramesh Ranchhoddas Joshi, filed a writ petition in the Bombay High Court. He failed to appear for the hearing on 4th March 2026. The record shows that after 2nd March 2016, the petitioner or his counsel did not take any steps to circulate the petition even once. The court inferred that the petitioner was not interested in pursuing the petition. Consequently, the court dismissed the petition for non‑prosecution.

Issues considered

  • Whether a writ petition may be dismissed for non‑prosecution when the petitioner fails to appear and take steps to pursue the case

Subjects

  • writ petition
  • dismissal
  • non‑prosecution
  • criminal appellate jurisdiction
  • Bombay High Court

Judgment

             ssm                                                    43-wp3624.2015.doc

                       IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

                              CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

                               WRIT PETITION NO. 3624 OF 2015

        Ramesh Ranchhoddas Joshi                                    …..Petitioner

                 Vs.

        The State Of Maharashtra & Ors.                             …..Respondents

                             ____________________________________

        None for the Petitioner.
        Smt. Ranjana D. Humane APP, for the Respondent-State.
                          ____________________________________

                                           CORAM :       A. S. GADKARI AND
                                                         KAMAL KHATA, JJ.
                                             DATE :      4th MARCH, 2026.

        P.C.:-

        1)              None for Petitioner when called out for hearing.

        2)              Record indicates that, after 2nd March, 2016, Petitioner and/or

        his Advocate has not taken any steps to circulate the Petition, even for once.

        2.1)            It appears that, the Petitioner is not interested in pursuing the

        Petition.

        3)              Dismissed for non-prosecution.




                   (KAMAL KHATA, J.)                         (A.S. GADKARI, J.)
          Digitally signed
          by SANJIV
          SHARNAPPA
SANJIV    MASHALKAR
SHARNAPPA
MASHALKAR Date:
          2026.03.06
          18:55:31
          +0530

                                                                                         1/1


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.