Bombay High Court
VINOD GOVIND PARABversusCHINCHPOKALI SARVAJANIK UTSAV MANDAL AND ORS.
- Decided
- Disposal
- Dissmiss For Default/Non-Prosecution
Holding
The petition is dismissed for non‑prosecution.
Summary
The petitioner filed a writ petition on 11 July 2019 but failed to appear for hearing and took no steps to circulate the petition. The court noted the petitioner’s apparent lack of interest in pursuing the case. Consequently, the petition was dismissed for non‑prosecution. No substantive arguments or evidence were presented. The dismissal was ordered by the Bombay High Court’s Criminal Appellate Jurisdiction.
Issues considered
- Whether the petition should be dismissed for non‑prosecution due to petitioner’s inaction
Subjects
- dismissal
- non‑prosecution
- writ petition
- criminal appellate jurisdiction
- Bombay High Court
Judgment
ssm 56-wp3625.2019.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO. 3625 OF 2019
Vinod Govind Parab …..Petitioner
Vs.
Chinchpokali Sarvajanik
Utsav Mandal & Ors. …..Respondents
____________________________________
None for the Petitioner.
Mr. J.P. Yagnik APP, for the Respondent-State.
____________________________________
CORAM : A. S. GADKARI AND
KAMAL KHATA, JJ.
DATE : 22nd JUNE, 2026.
P.C.:-
1) None for the Petitioner when called out for hearing.
2) Record indicates that, since the date of filing of the Petition i.e.
11th July, 2019, neither the Petitioner nor his Advocate has taken any steps
to circulate the Petition, even once.
2.1) It appears that, the Petitioner is not interested in pursuing the
Petition.
3) Dismissed for non-prosecution.
(KAMAL KHATA, J.) (A.S. GADKARI, J.)
Digitally signed
by SANJIV 1/1
SANJIV SHARNAPPA
SHARNAPPA MASHALKAR
MASHALKAR Date: 2026.06.29
12:23:10 +0530
Checking your session…