Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

MARUTI BHIKA PACHANGEversusTHE DEPUTY COLLECTOR REHABILITATION AND ORS

Decided
Disposal
Disposed off as Withdrawn

Holding

The Court allowed the withdrawal of the writ petitions and disposed of them.

Summary

Petitioners Tukaram Ganpat Pachange and Maruti Bhika Pachange filed writ petitions in the Bombay High Court challenging actions of the Deputy Collector, Rehabilitation, Pune and others. On counsel's instructions, they sought to withdraw the petitions. The Court granted permission to withdraw, ordered the petitions to be withdrawn, and disposed of them. The petitioners were left free to pursue any other legal remedies available. No substantive merits of the original claims were addressed.

Subjects

  • withdrawal of petition
  • writ petition
  • civil appellate jurisdiction
  • Bombay High Court

Judgment

                                                            7. WP 3624-2023.doc



                  IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                         CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

                         WRIT PETITION NO.3624 OF 2023

Tukaram Ganpat Pachange                    )
Sinde deceased through Legal Heir          )
Babusha Tukaram Pachange                   ).. Petitioner

          Versus

The Depputy Collector,                     )
Rehabilitation, Pune & Ors.                ).. Respondents

                                     WITH
                         WRIT PETITION NO.3625 OF 2023

Maruti Bhika Pachange             )
Sinde deceased through Legal Heir          )
Babusha Tukaram Pachange                   ).. Petitioner

          Versus

The Depputy Collector,                     )
Rehabilitation, Pune & Ors.                ).. Respondents


                                     ------
Ms Rachna Harpale, a/w Mr. Santosh Kurade and Ms. Anjali Shinde i/b
Nitin Deshpande, for the Petitioners in both Petitions.

Smt. M.P. Thakur, A.G.P. for Respondent Nos.1 to 5.
                                  ------

                         CORAM     : SARANG V. KOTWAL &
                                     SANDESH D. PATIL, JJ.

                        DATE       : 6th FEBRUARY 2026
P.C.

1)        Learned Counsel appearing for the Petitioners, on instructions,


RaJesh Chittewan, PS                                                              1/2
                                                          7. WP 3624-2023.doc



prays for withdrawal of these Petitions. Permission is granted. The

Petitions are allowed to be withdrawn and are disposed of.




2)        The Petitioners are at liberty to take any other steps in accordance

with law, if available.




 (SANDESH D. PATIL, J.)                       (SARANG V. KOTWAL, J.)




RaJesh Chittewan, PS                                                            2/2
                Digitally signed by
 RAJESH         RAJESH VASANT
 VASANT         CHITTEWAN
                Date: 2026.02.09
 CHITTEWAN      18:18:10 +0530


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.