Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

ANITA SHANKAR PATELversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS

Decided
Disposal
Dissmiss For Default/Non-Prosecution

Holding

The petition is dismissed for non‑prosecution.

Summary

Anita Shankar Patel filed Writ Petition No. 3637 of 2015 in the Bombay High Court seeking relief against the State of Maharashtra. The petitioner failed to appear for the hearing and, according to the record, did not take any steps to circulate the petition after 23 October 2015. The Court observed that the petitioner appeared uninterested in pursuing the matter. Consequently, the Court considered whether the petition could continue despite the lack of prosecution. It held that a petition which is not actively pursued must be dismissed. The petition was therefore dismissed for non‑prosecution.

Issues considered

  • Whether a writ petition that is not pursued by the petitioner should be dismissed for non‑prosecution?

Subjects

  • writ petition
  • non‑prosecution
  • dismissal
  • High Court
  • criminal appellate jurisdiction

Judgment

            ssm                                                     44-wp3637.2015.doc

                       IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

                              CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

                               WRIT PETITION NO. 3637 OF 2015

       Anita Shankar Patel                                          …..Petitioner

                Vs.

       The State Of Maharashtra & Ors.                              …..Respondents

                             ____________________________________

       None for the Petitioner.
       Smt. Madhavi H. Mhatre APP, for the Respondent-State.
                         ____________________________________

                                           CORAM :       A. S. GADKARI AND
                                                         KAMAL KHATA, JJ.
                                             DATE :      4th MARCH, 2026.

       P.C.:-

       1)               None for Petitioner when called out for hearing.

       2)               Record indicates that, after 23rd October, 2015, Petitioner

       and/or her Advocate has not taken any steps to circulate the Petition, even

       for once.

       2.1)             It appears that, the Petitioner is not interested in pursuing the

       Petition.

       3)               Dismissed for non-prosecution.




                  (KAMAL KHATA, J.)                          (A.S. GADKARI, J.)

          Digitally signed
          by SANJIV
SANJIV    SHARNAPPA
SHARNAPPA MASHALKAR
MASHALKAR Date:
          2026.03.06                                                                     1/1
          18:50:27 +0530


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.