Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

JANGID HOMES PVT LTDversusSLUM REHABILITATION AUTHORITY

Decided
Disposal
DISPOSED OFF

Holding

The Court held that the reference to ‘Municipal Corporation’ must be substituted with ‘MMRDA’ in the order dated 9 February 2026.

Summary

Jangid Homes Pvt. Ltd. filed a writ petition challenging an order dated 9 February 2026 issued by the High Court in a case involving the Slum Rehabilitation Authority. The petition sought correction of a typographical error where the term “Municipal Corporation” was used instead of the correct authority, “MMRDA”. The Court examined the petition and found that the correction was warranted. Consequently, the Court directed that the erroneous term be substituted with “MMRDA” in paragraph 2, line 7 of the order. The corrected order was to be made available to the parties.

Issues considered

  • Whether the term ‘Municipal Corporation’ in the order should be corrected to ‘MMRDA’

Subjects

  • order correction
  • writ petition
  • Slum Rehabilitation Authority
  • MMRDA
  • civil procedure

Judgment

                                                                                                           WP.3655.2025.DOC



                                                   IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                                                     ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION

                                                            WRIT PETITION NO.3655 OF 2025

                                  Jangid Homes Pvt.Ltd. Through its Director                              Petitioner
                                              versus
                                  Slum Rehabilitation Authority and others                                Respondents

                                                                           _______

                                  Mr.Chirag Balsara with Ms.Shubhada Wagle, Mr.NatashKotwal, Mr.Arman Mulla
                                  i/by RJD & Partners for Respondent no.7.
                                  Mr.Vishwanath Patil for SRA.
                                                                           _______

                                                                  CORAM:       G. S. KULKARNI &
                                                                               AARTI SATHE, JJ.

                                                                  DATE:        12th February 2026

                                  P.C.

                                  1.              Not on board. Taken on board.

                                  2.              The matter is mentioned for Speaking to the Minutes of order dated 9 th

                                  February 2026. It is stated that in paragraph no.2, line no.7, the reference made to

                                  `Municipal Corporation’ should have been to the “MMRDA”.

                                  3.              Accordingly in paragraph no.2, line no.7, the words `Municipal

                                  Corporation’ be substituted by word “MMRDA”.

                                  4.              The order dated 9th February 2026 be corrected accordingly and

                                  corrected order be made available to the parties.


            Digitally signed by
MANISH      MANISH
            SURESHRAO
SURESHRAO   THATTE
THATTE      Date: 2026.02.13
            11:21:05 +0530
                                               (AARTI SATHE, J.)                      (G. S. KULKARNI, J.)




                                  M.S.Thatte


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

Lawyer court records for this case

Associated through the court’s case reference.

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.