Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

JANA SMALL FINANCE BANK LTD THROU. MOHAMMED ABDUL KHALIDversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROU. GOVT PLEADER AND ORS

Decided
Disposal
Disposed Off

Holding

The petition is disposed as no further orders are necessary after compliance with the earlier directions.

Summary

Jana Small Finance Bank Ltd. filed a writ petition against the State of Maharashtra seeking relief regarding a secured asset. The petitioner claimed that the directions issued by the court on 2 April 2026 had been complied with and that physical possession of the asset had been handed over. The respondents did not contest the compliance. The court examined whether any further orders were necessary after the compliance. Finding that the petitioner had obtained possession as directed, the court held that no additional relief was required. Consequently, the petition was disposed of without further orders.

Issues considered

  • Whether the directions dated 2 April 2026 have been complied with by the respondents
  • Whether any further orders are necessary in the writ petition after compliance

Subjects

  • writ petition
  • possession
  • secured asset
  • compliance
  • disposal

Judgment

                                   bipin prithiani
                                                                        1
                                                                                              35-wp-3710.26.doc

                                           IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                                                   CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

                                                     WRIT PETITION NO. 3710 OF 2026

                                   Jana Small Finance Bank Ltd.                       …     Petitioner
                                         Versus
                                   The State of Maharashtra & Ors.                    …     Respondents
                                                                ******
                                   Mr. Balasaheb S. Choure (through V.C.) for the Petitioner.
             Digitally signed by
BIPIN
DHARMENDER
PRITHIANI
             BIPIN DHARMENDER
             PRITHIANI
             Date: 2026.04.24
                                   Adv. P. M. Deshpande, AGP for Respondent-State.
             10:28:35 +0530

                                                                ******
                                                         CORAM : MANISH PITALE AND
                                                                    SHREERAM V. SHIRSAT, JJ.

                                                              DATE      : 23rd APRIL 2026

                                   P.C. :

                                   .         The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the
                                   directions contained in order dated 2 nd April 2026 has been
                                   complied with and that physical possession of the secured asset has
                                   been handed over to the petitioner.

                                   2.        In view of the above, no further orders are necessary in this
                                   petition and accordingly, it is disposed of.



                                       (SHREERAM V. SHIRSAT, J.)                  (MANISH PITALE, J.)


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.