Bombay High Court
M/S. SIDDHIVINAYAK KOHINOOR VASTU THROUGH ITS PARTNERSversusMR. RAM U. PANJABI AND ORS.
- Decided
- Disposal
- Disposed Off
- Bench
- GAURI GODSE
Holding
The writ petition is dismissed as infructuous because the underlying suit had already been disposed of.
Summary
M/s. Siddhivinayak Kohinoor Vastu and its partners filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court seeking relief against the respondents. The petitioners alleged that a suit pending before the court clerk had not been disposed of. Upon examination, the court clerk’s records indicated that the suit had been disposed of on 11 October 2017. Since the underlying suit was already concluded, the writ petition could not be entertained. Consequently, the court held the petition to be infructuous and disposed of it without granting any relief to the petitioners.
Subjects
- writ petition
- infructuous
- disposal of suit
- Bombay High Court
Judgment
34-wp-3719-2017.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
varsha
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO. 3719 OF 2017
M/s. Siddhivinayak Kohinoor Vastu through its … Petitioners
Partners Shri Rajeshkumar Naupatlal Sakla
and Ors
vs.
Mr. Ram U. Panjabi and Ors … Respondents
Mr. Ajit Sharma i/b. Parinam Law Associates for the Petitioner.
CORAM : GAURI GODSE, J.
DATED : 12th JUNE 2026
ORDER:
Digitally
signed by
VARSHA
VARSHA VIJAY
VIJAY RAJGURU
RAJGURU Date:
2026.06.15
12:07:36
1. None for the petitioners.
+0530
2. The case status of the suit taken out by the court clerk shows
that the suit has been disposed of on 11th October 2017.
3. The writ petition is disposed of as infructuous.
(GAURI GODSE, J.)
Page no. 1 of 1
Checking your session…