Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

ANANDA BABAN SABLEversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS

Decided
Disposal
Dissmiss For Default/Non-Prosecution

Holding

The petition was dismissed for non‑prosecution.

Summary

The petitioner, Ananda Baban Sable, filed a writ petition on 15 September 2017. No steps were taken by the petitioner or his counsel to advance the petition, and the petitioner did not appear for hearing. The court observed that the petitioner appeared uninterested in pursuing the matter. Consequently, the petition was dismissed for non‑prosecution. The dismissal was ordered by the bench of Justices A.S. Gadkari and Kamal Khata.

Issues considered

  • Whether a writ petition may be dismissed for non‑prosecution when the petitioner fails to take any steps to pursue it

Subjects

  • writ petition
  • non‑prosecution
  • dismissal
  • high court

Judgment

                      KSG                                                            94-WP-3737-2017.doc



                                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

                                             CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

                                              WRIT PETITION NO. 3737 OF 2017

                      Ananda Baban Sable                                           … Petitioner
                               V/s.
                      State of Maharashtra & Ors                         … Respondents
                                      _______________________________________

                      None for the Petitioner.
         Digitally

KIRAN
         signed by
         KIRAN
         SANJAY
                      Smt. Madhavi H. Mhatre, A.P.P. for Respondent No.1-State.
SANJAY   GHUGE

GHUGE    Date:
         2026.04.27
         12:59:55
         +0530
                                      _______________________________________

                                                   CORAM : A. S. GADKARI AND
                                                           KAMAL KHATA, JJ.
                                                   DATE  : 18th APRIL 2026

                      P.C. :

                      1)              None for the Petitioner, when called out for hearing.

                      2)              Record indicates that, since the date of filing of the Petition i.e.

                      15th September, 2017, the Petitioner and/or his Advocate has not taken any

                      steps to circulate the Petition, even for once.

                      2.1)            It appears that, the Petitioner is not interested in pursuing the

                      Petition.

                      3)              Dismissed for non-prosecution.




                                      ( KAMAL KHATA, J. )                     ( A.S. GADKARI, J. )




                                                                                                           1/1


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.