Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

MUSTAFA HAJI MD. ISAK JULA AND OTHERSversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH THE SECRETARY AND OTHERS

Disposal
DISPOSED OFF

Holding

The Court allowed the withdrawal of the writ petition and disposed of it as withdrawn.

Summary

A writ petition (No. 3753 of 2026) was filed by Mustafa Haji Md. Isak Jula and others against the State of Maharashtra. The petitioners, through their counsel, sought leave of the court to withdraw the petition. The respondents were represented by counsel but no substantive arguments were advanced on the merits. The Court considered the petitioners' request and, finding no impediment, granted leave to withdraw. Consequently, the writ petition was disposed of as withdrawn.

Issues considered

  • Whether the High Court may grant leave to withdraw a pending writ petition

Subjects

  • writ petition
  • withdrawal
  • high court
  • civil procedure

Judgment

2026:BHC-AUG:15201-DB

                                                                             P1-WP-3753-26.odt
                                                {1}

                         IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                                    BENCH AT AURANGABAD

                                 1 WRIT PETITION NO. 3753 OF 2026

                                Mustafa Haji Md. Isak Jula And Others
                                              VERSUS
                                The State Of Maharashtra And Others

                                              ......
            Mr. R.S. Naikwade, Advocate h/f Mr. J.M. Murkute, Advocte for the
            Petitioenr
            Mr. S.B. Pulkundwar, AGP for Respondent No.1-State
            Mr. Nilesh N. Desale, Advocate for Respondents No.2 and 3

                                                 ......

                                             CORAM : SMT. VIBHA KANKANWADI AND
                                                     HITEN S. VENEGAVKAR, JJ.
                                              DATE        : 08 APRIL, 2026

            PER COURT :-

            1.         Not on board. Upon mentioning taken on board.


            2.         Learned advocate for the petitioners, on oral instructions from

            the petitioners, seeks leave to withdraw the present writ petition.


            3.         Leave granted.


            4.         The writ petition stands disposed of as withdrawn.



            [ HITEN S. VENEGAVKAR ]                         [ SMT. VIBHA KANKANWADI ]
                         JUDGE                                         JUDGE


            S P Rane


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.