Bombay High Court
PRASHANT RAOSAHEB MOHITEversusKALPANA PRASHANT MOHITE
- Disposal
- DISPOSED OFF
Holding
The writ petition is infructuous and is disposed of accordingly.
Summary
The petitioner, Prashant Raosaheb Mohite, filed a writ petition (No. 3766 of 2017) against Kalpana Prashant Mohite. After a long lapse of time, the petitioner’s counsel submitted that no cause of action or relief remained, rendering the petition infructuous. The Court examined the submission and found no material to sustain the petition. Consequently, the Court held that the petition could not proceed. The writ petition was therefore disposed of as infructuous. No substantive merits of the dispute were adjudicated.
Issues considered
- Whether the writ petition has become infructuous due to the passage of time?
Subjects
- writ petition
- infructuous
- limitation
- petition dismissed
- high court
Judgment
2026:BHC-AUG:9125
42 WP No.3766.2017
-1-
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
BENCH AT AURANGABAD
WRIT PETITION NO. 3766 OF 2017
PRASHANT RAOSAHEB MOHITE
VERSUS
KALPANA PRASHANT MOHITE
...
Advocate for the Petitioner : Mr. P. V. Barde
...
CORAM : SIDDHESHWAR S. THOMBRE, J.
Date : 4th March, 2026
PER COURT :-
1. The learned counsel for petitioner submits that due to
passage of time, nothing survives in the petition. Accordingly, the
present petition has become infructuous.
2. In view of the above, the writ petition stands disposed of as
infructuous.
(SIDDHESHWAR S. THOMBRE, J.)
Omkar Joshi
Checking your session…