Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

LAXMAN JAYWANT KOLHEversusMATHARDEV ASHRU KATE AND ORS

Disposal
DISPOSED OFF

Holding

The petition is rendered infructuous due to the passage of time and is therefore disposed.

Summary

Petitioner Laxman Jaywant Kolhe filed writ petition No. 3775 of 2013 before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad bench, challenging the actions of respondents Mathardev Ashru Kate and others. The petition sought relief, but the petitioner later contended that the passage of time had rendered the petition infructuous. Learned counsel for the petitioner, Mr. Narayan B. Narwade, submitted that the petition could no longer be entertained due to the lapse of time. The bench, after considering the submission, held that the petition was indeed rendered infructuous. Consequently, the court disposed of the writ petition as infructuous without addressing the merits. No statutes or precedents were cited in the decision.

Issues considered

  • Whether the writ petition is maintainable despite the lapse of time?

Subjects

  • writ petition
  • limitation
  • infructuous
  • procedural dismissal
  • high court

Judgment

2026:BHC-AUG:32328



                                                                  46 WP3775.2012
                                              -1-

                        IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                                  BENCH AT AURANGABAD

                             46 WRIT PETITION NO. 3775 OF 2013

                                LAXMAN JAYWANT KOLHE
                                            VERSUS
                            MATHARDEV ASHRU KATE AND ORS
                                               ...
              Advocate for the Petitioner : Mr. Narayan B. Narwade
                                               ...


                                          CORAM : SACHIN S. DESHMUKH, J.
                                             Date : 31.07.2026

              PER COURT :-

              1.           Mr. Narayan B. Narwade, learned counsel for the

              Petitioner submits that by passage of time the Petition is

              rendered infructuous.


              2.           The Writ Petition stands disposed of as infructuous.




                                                    (SACHIN S. DESHMUKH, J.)

              marathe


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.