Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

OMPRAKASH PREMDASJI VAISHNAV AND ANR.versusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS.

Decided
Disposal
Dissmiss For Default/Non-Prosecution

Holding

The petition is dismissed for non‑prosecution.

Summary

The petitioners filed a writ petition on 23 July 2019 in the Bombay High Court seeking relief against the State of Maharashtra. No steps were taken by the petitioners or their counsel to circulate the petition after filing. The court observed that the petitioners appeared uninterested in pursuing the matter. Consequently, the court considered whether the petition should be dismissed for non‑prosecution. Relying on procedural rules, the judges held that a petition left unattended amounts to non‑prosecution. The petition was therefore dismissed. No substantive merits of the petition were examined.

Issues considered

  • Whether a writ petition that remains uncirculated and unattended by the petitioners should be dismissed for non‑prosecution

Subjects

  • writ petition
  • non-prosecution
  • dismissal
  • procedural default
  • Bombay High Court

Judgment

            ssm                                                            59-wp3808.2019.doc

                           IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

                                    CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

                                     WRIT PETITION NO. 3808 OF 2019

       Omprakash Premdasji Vaishnav & Anr.                           …..Petitioners

                  Vs.

       The State Of Maharashtra & Ors.                               …..Respondents

                                   ____________________________________

       None for the Petitioners.
       Smt. P.P. Shinde APP, for the Respondent-State.
                         ____________________________________

                                                 CORAM :      A. S. GADKARI AND
                                                              KAMAL KHATA, JJ.
                                                   DATE :     22nd JUNE, 2026.


       P.C.:-

       1)                    None for Petitioners when called out for hearing.

       2)                    Record indicates that, since the date of filing of the Petition i.e.

       23rd July, 2019, neither the Petitioners nor their Advocates have taken any

       steps to circulate the Petition, even once.

       2.1)                  It appears that, the Petitioners are not interested in pursuing

       the Petition.

       3)                    Dismissed for non-prosecution.



                    (KAMAL KHATA, J.)                               (A.S. GADKARI, J.)

                Digitally signed
SANJIV    by SANJIV
          SHARNAPPA
SHARNAPPA MASHALKAR                                                                             1/1
MASHALKAR Date: 2026.06.29
                12:28:39 +0530


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.