Bombay High Court
ROHIT PHADTAREversusCOMMISSIONER OF POLICE AND ORS
- Decided
- Disposal
- Dissmiss For Default/Non-Prosecution
Holding
The petition is dismissed for non‑prosecution.
Summary
The petitioner, Rohit Phadtare, failed to appear for the hearing and did not take any steps to circulate the writ petition after July 4, 2018, indicating a lack of interest in pursuing the case. The respondents, represented by Smt. P. P. Shinde, highlighted this inactivity. The Court examined whether the petition could continue despite the petitioner's non‑participation. Finding that the petitioner had effectively abandoned the proceedings, the Court dismissed the petition for non‑prosecution. The dismissal was entered without any further orders.
Issues considered
- Whether a writ petition may be dismissed for non‑prosecution when the petitioner fails to appear and does not take steps to advance the petition
Subjects
- writ petition
- non‑prosecution
- petition dismissed
- criminal appellate jurisdiction
- court procedure
Judgment
pmk 97-WP-3828-2017.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO.3828 of 2017
Rohit Phadtare … Petitioner
V/s.
Commissioner of Police & Ors. … Respondents
None for the Petitioner.
Smt. P. P. Shinde, APP for the Respondent-State.
D. S. Patil, API, Kolshewadi Police Station.
CORAM : A. S. GADKARI AND
KAMAL KHATA, JJ.
DATE : 18th April, 2026
P.C.:-
1) None for Petitioner, when called out for hearing.
2) Record indicates that, after 4 th July, 2018 Petitioner and/or his
Advocate has not taken any steps to circulate the Petition, even for once.
2.1) It appears that, the Petitioner is not interested in pursuing the
Petition.
3) Dismissed for non-prosecution.
(KAMAL KHATA, J.) (A.S. GADKARI, J.)
1/1
Checking your session…